On 21/01/2025 16:39, Peter Griffin wrote: >>> + The FLTCON register (on alive banks) has the following layout >>> + * >>> + * BitfieldName[PinNum][Bit:Bit] >>> + * FLT_EN[3][31] FLT_SEL[3][30] FLT_WIDTH[3][29:24] >>> + * FLT_EN[2][23] FLT_SEL[2][22] FLT_WIDTH[2][21:16] >>> + * FLT_EN[1][15] FLT_SEL[1][14] FLT_WIDTH[1][13:8] >>> + * FLT_EN[0][7] FLT_SEL[0][6] FLT_WIDTH[0][5:0] >>> + * >>> + * FLT_EN 0x0 = Disable, 0x1=Enable >>> + * FLT_SEL 0x0 = Delay filter, 0x1 Digital filter >> >> It's a delay filter filter either way, right? If so, I >> think '0x0 = Delay filter' should instead be reworded to >> '0x0 = Analog filter'. > > I see your point, and kind of agree that Analog is a better name. The > rationale for going with "Digital filter" and "Delay filter" was that > it matches the FLT_SEL bitfield description in the datasheet. I > thought it might confuse people using a different name. The info about > it being Analog filter came via a bug from Samsung. But if folks > prefer Analog I can use that instead. > > @Krzysztof any thoughts on the above naming? No clue / no preference, you guys have datasheet and more insight into this. :) Best regards, Krzysztof