Re: [PATCH] gpio: pca953x: Improve interrupt support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> On Mon, Jan 27, 2025 at 09:47:17AM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 21, 2025 at 12:12 PM lakabd <lakabd.work@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > Le mar. 14 janv. 2025 à 16:44, work work <lakabd.work@xxxxxxxxx> a écrit :
> > > > Le mar. 14 janv. 2025 à 10:37, Andy Shevchenko
> > > > <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx> a écrit :
> > > > > On Tue, Jan 14, 2025 at 12:03 AM lakabd <lakabd.work@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> ...
>
> Okay, I have read a lot the datasheet (PCAL9535A), and while Fig.12 shows
> an example of what happens in practice, neither the schematic on Fig.6 nor
> the description of the interrupt status register doesn't clarify this
> behaviour. The bottom line is that the latch helps only to keep the input data
> for longer and doesn't anyhow affect the input change on another pin while
> servicing the one that asserts the interrupt. Basically what they should have
> said is that the interrupt status register snapshot is made on the very first
> event and doesn't reflect the actual status anymore in case more input changes
> are coming. Hence there is no practical use of the interrupt status register.

Indeed, I came to the same conclusion i.e., if reading the interrupt
status register doesn't reset the interrupt line it is not practical
and can be considered a HW design flaw.

>
> Seems to me a good candidate for errata. Does anybody inform NXP about this?
>
> Meanwhile looking into the code I'm wondering why we can't actually use
> just input port register data with the logic as for PCAL. Nonetheless this
> can be optimized later. I think Mark's patch is good enough as current fix.
>

If we accept Mark's patch there will be no difference between PCA_PCAL
and regular chips in IRQ handling.
Looking at pca953x_irq_pending() the process for non-PCA_PCAL is quite
slower; there is one I2C read in addition, plus multiple bitmap
operations. I think that the solution I proposed at least helps in
keeping the leverage for PCA_PCAL chips.

--
Best Regards,
Abderrahim LAKBIR





[Index of Archives]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux