On Tue, Jan 14, 2025 at 12:19 AM Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > The i.MX GPIO driver has had deterministic numbering for the GPIOs > for more than 12 years. > > Reverting this to dynamically numbered will break existing setups in the > worst manner possible: The build will succeed, the kernel will not print > warnings, but users will find their devices essentially toggling GPIOs > at random with the potential of permanent damage. We thus want to keep > the numbering as-is until the SysFS API is removed and script fail > instead of toggling GPIOs dependent on probe order. While I understand the issue this tends to get never fixed until the entire support of iMX boards will be dropped. Personally I do not like this series at all. Rather let's try to go the hard way and understand what's going on to fix the current issues. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko