On 10/01/2025 14:32, Csókás Bence wrote: > Hi, > > On 2025. 01. 10. 14:00, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: >> From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@xxxxxxxxxx> >> >> There were other suggested solutions (for instance: just use the >> existing compatible for the On Semi variant) but I figured the most >> common approach is to use a fallback value for 100% compatible models >> and this is what Rob suggested as well. >> >> This reverts the driver change and makes the "onnn,74hc595a" compatible >> use "fairchild,74hc595" as fallback. > > Is there any reason to introduce a new compatible name at all? Does some Yes, DT bindings preference, see writing bindings. I assume of course this is a separate device. You cannot use other compatible "foo" for some other device "bar". Best regards, Krzysztof
Re: [PATCH 0/2] gpio: 74x164: use a compatible fallback and don't extend the driver
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] gpio: 74x164: use a compatible fallback and don't extend the driver
- From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2025 11:56:05 +0100
- In-reply-to: <de6b70f2-8fd6-4e2a-a6c1-466698be8a6b@prolan.hu>
- References: <20250110130025.55004-1-brgl@bgdev.pl> <de6b70f2-8fd6-4e2a-a6c1-466698be8a6b@prolan.hu>
- User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
- References:
- [PATCH 0/2] gpio: 74x164: use a compatible fallback and don't extend the driver
- From: Bartosz Golaszewski
- Re: [PATCH 0/2] gpio: 74x164: use a compatible fallback and don't extend the driver
- From: Csókás Bence
- [PATCH 0/2] gpio: 74x164: use a compatible fallback and don't extend the driver
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Revert "gpio: 74x164: Add On Semi MC74HC595A compat"
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 0/2] gpio: 74x164: use a compatible fallback and don't extend the driver
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/2] gpio: 74x164: use a compatible fallback and don't extend the driver
- Next by thread: [PATCH v6 0/3] Add support for SAMA7D65
- Index(es):
 |