Re: [PATCH RESEND 00/22] Add support for A100/A133 display

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 12/30/24 7:41 PM, Andre Przywara wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Dec 2024 20:06:30 +0530
> Parthiban <parthiban@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> On 12/27/24 6:30 PM, Parthiban Nallathambi wrote:
>>> This series depends on [1] for the eMMC/MMC controller to work and
>>> [2] (lined up for 6.14) which adds support for the sram nodes and
>>> display engine extends it's usage. Idea of this series to get initial
>>> feedback and adjust, which will be rebased for 6.14 once [2] is merged.
>>>
>>> This patch series adds support for A133 display pipeline based on
>>> LVDS. dt-bindigs are organized in the start and later with code
>>> changes.
>>>
>>> PHY is shared between DSI and LVDS, so to control the PHY specific
>>> to DSI/LVDS, phy_ops set_mode is introduced. To enable the DSI
>>> using set_mode, analog control register MIPI Enable is used, which
>>> may not be available for A31 (shares the same driver).
>>>
>>> Otherwise, A133 also got hidden independent display engine i.e
>>> mixer + tcon top to handle parallel display. But this patch series
>>> adds only support for the 1 mixer which is documented.
>>>
>>> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-sunxi/20241109003739.3440904-1-masterr3c0rd@epochal.quest/
>>> [2]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-sunxi/20241218-a100-syscon-v2-0-dae60b9ce192@epochal.quest/
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Parthiban Nallathambi <parthiban@xxxxxxxxxxx>  
>> Apologize for polluting with resend again. My internal mail server got blocked due to
>> volume count, which resulted in incomplete series again.
> 
> I guess an incomplete send was the reason for the original resend? Please
> note this at the top of the cover letter then, otherwise it's not easy
> to see why you send something again. Something like:
> 
> *** Re-sent due to mail server not sending out the complete series. ***
Yes I did add that using b4 as below, but "b4 send --resend" didn't pick the
updated cover letter though. I will check with "--reflect" next time.

EDIT:
Due to internal mail server issue, [3] missed few patches in series.
So am resending to hope that it will get through this time. Sorry
to pollute.

[3]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-sunxi/20241227-a133-display-support-v1-0-13b52f71fb14@xxxxxxxxxxx
> 
> It also helps to split up the recipients, so that everyone gets the cover
> letter, but only the respective subsystem maintainers get the patches
> touching their subsystem. I would CC: the DT maintainers on every patch,
> though.
> It's a bit more complicated to set up, but keeps the noise down for those
> large-ish series, for instance for the IOMMU people, who presumably have
> little interest in DT or graphics code.
The whole series based on b4 and the list is auto prepared using
"b4 prep --auto-to-cc".

Sure, I will add the dt list in all the patches. Also many thanks for your
review and feedback.

Thanks,
Parthiban

> 
> Cheers,
> Andre
> 
>> I will fix the mail server issue before resending the series. Sorry.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Parthiban
>>
>>
> 
> 





[Index of Archives]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux