On Fri, Dec 27, 2024 at 03:28:07PM +0000, Sudeep Holla wrote: >On Wed, Dec 25, 2024 at 04:20:45PM +0800, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote: >> From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@xxxxxxx> >> >> pinctrl-scmi.c and pinctrl-imx-scmi.c, both use SCMI_PROTOCOL_PINCTRL. >> If both drivers are built in, and the scmi device with name "pinctrl-imx" >> is created earlier, and the fwnode device points to the scmi device, >> non-i.MX platforms will never have the pinctrl supplier ready. >> > >I wonder if we can prevent creation of "pinctrl-imx" scmi device on non >i.MX platforms instead of this hack which IMO is little less hackier >(and little more cleaner as we don't create problem and then fix here) >than this change. I thought two ways that introduce new entries in scmi_device_id, 1. compatible string. 2. allowed machine string and blcoked machine string. Thanks, Peng > >-- >Regards, >Sudeep