Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] dt-bindings: pinctrl: qcom: rename spi0 pins on IPQ5424

[Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On 27/12/2024 10:18, Manikanta Mylavarapu wrote:
> 
> 
> On 12/27/2024 1:06 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 27/12/2024 08:24, Manikanta Mylavarapu wrote:
>>> SPI protocol runs on serial engine 4. Hence rename
>>> spi0 pins to spi4 like spi0_cs to spi4_cs etc.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Manikanta Mylavarapu <quic_mmanikan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>
>>
>> <form letter>
>> This is a friendly reminder during the review process.
>>
>> It looks like you received a tag and forgot to add it.
>>
>> If you do not know the process, here is a short explanation:
>> Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by/Tested-by tags when posting new versions
>> of patchset, under or above your Signed-off-by tag, unless patch changed
>> significantly (e.g. new properties added to the DT bindings). Tag is
>> "received", when provided in a message replied to you on the mailing
>> list. Tools like b4 can help here. However, there's no need to repost
>> patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream maintainer will do that for
>> tags received on the version they apply.
>>
>> Please read:
>> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.12-rc3/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L577
>>
>> If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.
>> </form letter>
>>
> 
> Hi Krzysztof,
> 
> 	Patches #1 to #4 are newly added in V3 (to rename SPI0 to SPI4). Hence, there are no A-b/R-b
> 	tags associated with these patches. I mentioned this information in the cover letter.
> 	
> 	I assume you are referring to Patch #1 from the V2 series.
> 	Patch #1 [1] and #2 [2] from the V2 series have been merged into linux-next.
> 	[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20241217091308.3253897-2-quic_mmanikan@xxxxxxxxxxx/
> 	[2] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20241217091308.3253897-3-quic_mmanikan@xxxxxxxxxxx/
> 
> 	Please let me know if i missed anything.

v3 mislead me here and three different subsystems in one patchset.

Anyway, if this is different patch then review follows - there is no ABI
impact explanation and this is an ABI break. What's more, entries are
not sorted anymore and why there is a gap? spi4, spi1 and spi10? Where
is spi3?

Not sure if this renaming is useful or correct, especially considering
not many arguments in commit msg (e.g. datasheet?).


Best regards,
Krzysztof