Dear Alexandre, Thank you for your comments, Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@xxxxxxxxxxx> 於 2024年12月16日 週一 下午6:42寫道: > > On 10/12/2024 18:45:24+0800, Ming Yu wrote: > > +static int nct6694_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > > +{ > > + struct nct6694_rtc_data *data; > > + struct nct6694 *nct6694 = dev_get_drvdata(pdev->dev.parent); > > + int ret, irq; > > + > > + irq = irq_create_mapping(nct6694->domain, NCT6694_IRQ_RTC); > > + if (!irq) > > + return -EINVAL; > > + > > + data = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*data), GFP_KERNEL); > > + if (!data) > > + return -ENOMEM; > > + > > + data->xmit_buf = devm_kcalloc(&pdev->dev, NCT6694_MAX_PACKET_SZ, > > + sizeof(unsigned char), GFP_KERNEL); > > + if (!data->xmit_buf) > > + return -ENOMEM; > > + > > + data->rtc = devm_rtc_allocate_device(&pdev->dev); > > + if (IS_ERR(data->rtc)) > > + return PTR_ERR(data->rtc); > > + > > + data->nct6694 = nct6694; > > + data->rtc->ops = &nct6694_rtc_ops; > > + data->rtc->range_min = RTC_TIMESTAMP_BEGIN_2000; > > + data->rtc->range_max = RTC_TIMESTAMP_END_2099; > > + > > + mutex_init(&data->lock); > > You should use rtc_lock/rtc_unlock instead of having your own lock. The > core will take and release the lock appropriately before calling the > rtc_ops so you only have to do it in the irq handler. > Understood. I will make the modifications in the next patch. > > + > > + device_set_wakeup_capable(&pdev->dev, 1); > > This will cause a memory leak later on, see the discussion here: > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-rtc/a88475b6-08bf-4c7c-ad63-efd1f29307e3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/T/#mf51fdce6036efa3ea12fe75bd5126d4ac0c6813e > Okay! I will drop it and add device_init_wakeup() in the next patch. Best regards, Ming