On Monday 30 November 2015 09:47:03 Linus Walleij wrote: > On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 4:21 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > resource_size_t may be defined as 32 or 64 bit depending on configuration, > > so it cannot be printed using the normal format strings, as gcc correctly > > warns: > > > > pinctrl-at91-pio4.c: In function 'atmel_pinctrl_probe': > > pinctrl-at91-pio4.c:1003:41: warning: format '%u' expects argument of type 'unsigned int', but argument 5 has type 'resource_size_t {aka long long unsigned int}' [-Wformat=] > > dev_dbg(dev, "bank %i: hwirq=%u\n", i, res->start); > > > > This changes the format string to use the special "%pr" format > > string that prints a resource, and changes the arguments so we > > the resource structure directly. > > > > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> > > --- > > v2: don't break ordering of arguments, that part was correct already, unlike > > what I said in v1. > > Patch applied with Ludovic's review tag. I don't see this in linux-next, did the commit get lost accidentally? Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html