On 12/15/24 9:40 PM, Mingwei Zheng wrote:
[...]
@@ -1617,10 +1602,18 @@ int stm32_pctl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
return -EINVAL;
}
pctl->banks = devm_kcalloc(dev, banks, sizeof(*pctl->banks),
- GFP_KERNEL);
+ GFP_KERNEL);
Please drop this one change.
if (!pctl->banks)
return -ENOMEM;
+ pctl->clks = devm_kcalloc(dev, banks, sizeof(*pctl->clks),
+ GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!pctl->clks)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < banks; ++i)
+ pctl->clks[i].id = "";
Is this ^ assignment necessary ? If so, why ?
[...]