On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 5:41 PM, Andrew F. Davis <afd@xxxxxx> wrote: > What I'm worried about looks to have happened with the gpio-74x164 > driver, this is kind of the companion device to mine (74164 / 74165) > and should work with any 74164 compatible shift register (possibly 100s > of versions of them), but the compatible string that was added is > "fairchild,74hc595", a relatively new device by a single manufacturer. In hindsight, that probably should have been "motorola,mc74hc595" instead. Recently I read that Motorola invented the 74hc59x for their "new" SPI bus as that time, as the 74164 is not 100% SPI-compatible. Given the limitations of the '164 for SPI, is the same true for '165, and should it be "[...]74[...]597" instead? > The problem this has is then that boards will use this compatible string > even if the parts are not actually the Fairchild version, just to get > the match, when they should be using a generic string. They're all supposed to be "compatible". Personally, I wouldn't object to just "74595", cfr. "ns16550a". Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html