On Wed. 11 Dec. 2024 at 18:59, Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 10.12.2024 18:45:21, Ming Yu wrote:
> > This driver supports Socket CANfd functionality for NCT6694 MFD
> > device based on USB interface.
>
> Please use the rx-offload helper, otherwise the CAN frames might be
> revived out of order.
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ming Yu <tmyu0@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > MAINTAINERS | 1 +
> > drivers/net/can/Kconfig | 10 +
> > drivers/net/can/Makefile | 1 +
> > drivers/net/can/nct6694_canfd.c | 920 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 4 files changed, 932 insertions(+)
> > create mode 100644 drivers/net/can/nct6694_canfd.c
> >
> > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> > index a190f2b08fa3..eb5d46825e71 100644
> > --- a/MAINTAINERS
> > +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> > @@ -16548,6 +16548,7 @@ S: Supported
> > F: drivers/gpio/gpio-nct6694.c
> > F: drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-nct6694.c
> > F: drivers/mfd/nct6694.c
> > +F: drivers/net/can/nct6694_canfd.c
> > F: include/linux/mfd/nct6694.h
> >
> > NVIDIA (rivafb and nvidiafb) FRAMEBUFFER DRIVER
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/can/Kconfig b/drivers/net/can/Kconfig
> > index cf989bea9aa3..130e98ec28a5 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/can/Kconfig
> > +++ b/drivers/net/can/Kconfig
> > @@ -200,6 +200,16 @@ config CAN_SUN4I
> > To compile this driver as a module, choose M here: the module will
> > be called sun4i_can.
> >
> > +config CAN_NCT6694
> > + tristate "Nuvoton NCT6694 Socket CANfd support"
> > + depends on MFD_NCT6694
> > + help
> > + If you say yes to this option, support will be included for Nuvoton
> > + NCT6694, a USB device to socket CANfd controller.
> > +
> > + This driver can also be built as a module. If so, the module will
> > + be called nct6694_canfd.
> > +
> > config CAN_TI_HECC
> > depends on ARM
> > tristate "TI High End CAN Controller"
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/can/Makefile b/drivers/net/can/Makefile
> > index a71db2cfe990..4a6b5b9d6c2b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/can/Makefile
> > +++ b/drivers/net/can/Makefile
> > @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_CAN_JANZ_ICAN3) += janz-ican3.o
> > obj-$(CONFIG_CAN_KVASER_PCIEFD) += kvaser_pciefd.o
> > obj-$(CONFIG_CAN_MSCAN) += mscan/
> > obj-$(CONFIG_CAN_M_CAN) += m_can/
> > +obj-$(CONFIG_CAN_NCT6694) += nct6694_canfd.o
> > obj-$(CONFIG_CAN_PEAK_PCIEFD) += peak_canfd/
> > obj-$(CONFIG_CAN_SJA1000) += sja1000/
> > obj-$(CONFIG_CAN_SUN4I) += sun4i_can.o
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/can/nct6694_canfd.c b/drivers/net/can/nct6694_canfd.c
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..54f20f0681e2
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/drivers/net/can/nct6694_canfd.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,920 @@
> > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> > +/*
> > + * Nuvoton NCT6694 Socket CANfd driver based on USB interface.
> > + *
> > + * Copyright (C) 2024 Nuvoton Technology Corp.
> > + */
> > +
> > +#include <linux/can/dev.h>
> > +#include <linux/ethtool.h>
> > +#include <linux/irqdomain.h>
> > +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> > +#include <linux/mfd/core.h>
> > +#include <linux/mfd/nct6694.h>
> > +#include <linux/module.h>
> > +#include <linux/netdevice.h>
> > +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> > +
> > +#define DRVNAME "nct6694-can"
> > +
> > +/* Host interface */
> > +#define NCT6694_CAN_MOD 0x05
> > +
> > +/* Message Channel*/
> > +/* Command 00h */
Instead of this comment, explain what the command 00h does.
Also better to give a memorable name instead of CMD0. For example:
CMD_TX, CMD_RX…
If possible, make it match the structure names.
> > +#define NCT6694_CAN_CMD0_OFFSET(idx) (idx ? 0x0100 : 0x0000)
> > +#define NCT6694_CAN_CTRL1_MON BIT(0)
> > +#define NCT6694_CAN_CTRL1_NISO BIT(1)
> > +#define NCT6694_CAN_CTRL1_LBCK BIT(2)
> > +
> > +/* Command 01h */
> > +#define NCT6694_CAN_CMD1_OFFSET 0x0001
> > +
> > +/* Command 02h */
> > +#define NCT6694_CAN_CMD2_OFFSET(idx, mask) \
> > + ({ typeof(mask) mask_ = (mask); \
> > + idx ? ((0x80 | (mask_ & 0xFF)) << 8 | 0x02) : \
> > + ((0x00 | (mask_ & 0xFF)) << 8 | 0x02); })
> > +
> > +#define NCT6694_CAN_EVENT_ERR BIT(0)
> > +#define NCT6694_CAN_EVENT_STATUS BIT(1)
> > +#define NCT6694_CAN_EVENT_TX_EVT BIT(2)
> > +#define NCT6694_CAN_EVENT_RX_EVT BIT(3)
> > +#define NCT6694_CAN_EVENT_REC BIT(4)
> > +#define NCT6694_CAN_EVENT_TEC BIT(5)
> > +#define NCT6694_CAN_EVT_TX_FIFO_EMPTY BIT(7) /* Read-clear */
> > +#define NCT6694_CAN_EVT_RX_DATA_LOST BIT(5) /* Read-clear */
> > +#define NCT6694_CAN_EVT_RX_HALF_FULL BIT(6) /* Read-clear */
> > +#define NCT6694_CAN_EVT_RX_DATA_IN BIT(7)
> > +
> > +/* Command 10h */
> > +#define NCT6694_CAN_CMD10_OFFSET(buf_cnt) \
> > + (((buf_cnt) & 0xFF) << 8 | 0x10)
> > +#define NCT6694_CAN_TAG_CAN0 0xC0
> > +#define NCT6694_CAN_TAG_CAN1 0xC1
> > +#define NCT6694_CAN_FLAG_EFF BIT(0)
> > +#define NCT6694_CAN_FLAG_RTR BIT(1)
> > +#define NCT6694_CAN_FLAG_FD BIT(2)
> > +#define NCT6694_CAN_FLAG_BRS BIT(3)
> > +#define NCT6694_CAN_FLAG_ERR BIT(4)
> > +
> > +/* Command 11h */
> > +#define NCT6694_CAN_CMD11_OFFSET(idx, buf_cnt) \
> > + ({ typeof(buf_cnt) buf_cnt_ = (buf_cnt); \
> > + idx ? ((0x80 | (buf_cnt_ & 0xFF)) << 8 | 0x11) : \
> > + ((0x00 | (buf_cnt_ & 0xFF)) << 8 | 0x11); })
Simplify this. Do something like:
#define NCT6694_CAN_CMD11_OFFSET(idx, buf_cnt) \
(idx ? 0x80 : 0x00) | \
(buf_cnt & 0xFF)) << 8 | 0x11) \
(apply this also to NCT6694_CAN_CMD2_OFFSET())
> > +#define NCT6694_CAN_RX_QUOTA 64
> > +
> > +enum nct6694_event_err {
> > + NCT6694_CAN_EVT_NO_ERROR,
> ^^^ add _ERR_
> > + NCT6694_CAN_EVT_CRC_ERROR,
> > + NCT6694_CAN_EVT_STUFF_ERROR,
> > + NCT6694_CAN_EVT_ACK_ERROR,
> > + NCT6694_CAN_EVT_FORM_ERROR,
> > + NCT6694_CAN_EVT_BIT_ERROR,
> > + NCT6694_CAN_EVT_TIMEOUT_ERROR,
> > + NCT6694_CAN_EVT_UNKNOWN_ERROR,
> > +};
> > +
> > +enum nct6694_event_status {
> > + NCT6694_CAN_EVT_ERROR_ACTIVE,
> ^^^ add _STATUS_
> > + NCT6694_CAN_EVT_ERROR_PASSIVE,
> > + NCT6694_CAN_EVT_BUS_OFF,
> > + NCT6694_CAN_EVT_WARNING,
> > +};
> > +
> > +struct __packed nct6694_can_setting {
> > + __le32 nbr;
> > + __le32 dbr;
> > + u8 active;
> > + u8 reserved[3];
> > + __le16 ctrl1;
> > + __le16 ctrl2;
> > + __le32 nbtp;
> > + __le32 dbtp;
> > +};
> > +
> > +struct __packed nct6694_can_information {
> > + u8 tx_fifo_cnt;
> > + u8 rx_fifo_cnt;
> > + __le16 reserved;
> u8 reserved[2];
> > + __le32 can_clk;
> > +};
> > +
> > +struct __packed nct6694_can_event {
> > + u8 err1;
> > + u8 status1;
> > + u8 tx_evt1;
> > + u8 rx_evt1;
> > + u8 rec1;
> > + u8 tec1;
> > + u8 reserved1[2];
> > + u8 err2;
> > + u8 status2;
> > + u8 tx_evt2;
> > + u8 rx_evt2;
> > + u8 rec2;
> > + u8 tec2;
> > + u8 reserved2[2];
> > +};
>
> Create an extra struct that only describes a channel
>
> struct __packed nct6694_can_event_channel {
> u8 err;
> u8 status;
> u8 tx_evt;
> u8 rx_evt;
> u8 rec;
> u8 tec;
> u8 reserved[2];
> }
>
> and put an array of 2 into struct __packed nct6694_can_event.
>
> > +
> > +struct __packed nct6694_can_xmit {
Is this struct for both TX and RX? If so, name it something like
struct nct6694_can_frame
The term xmit is only used for transmission, not for reception.
> > + u8 tag;
> > + u8 flag;
> > + u8 reserved;
> > + u8 dlc;
> > + __le32 id;
> > + u8 data[64];
> > + u8 msg_buf[72];
>
> Why is the message so long? What's in the msg_buf?
>
> > +};
> > +
> > +struct nct6694_can_priv {
> > + struct can_priv can; /* must be the first member */
> > + struct net_device *ndev;
> > + struct nct6694 *nct6694;
> > + struct mutex lock;
>
> What does lock protect?
+1
mutexes are good if you want to keep the lock for a long time.
For short period, spinlock are more performant:
spinlock_t lock;
> > + struct sk_buff *tx_skb;
> > + struct workqueue_struct *wq;
> > + struct work_struct tx_work;
> > + unsigned char *tx_buf;
> void *
> > + unsigned char *rx_buf;
> void *
Rather than void*, tx_buf and rx_buf can be replaced by an union:
union nct6694_can_rx {
struct nct6694_can_event event;
struct nct6694_can_xmit xmit;
struct nct6694_can_information info;
};
(same for nct6694_can_tx)
Then in struct nct6694_can_priv, you will just have:
union nct6694_can_tx tx;
union nct6694_can_rx rx;
With this,
NCT6694_MAX_PACKET_SZ
can most likely be replaced by sizeof(union nct6694_can_rx) or
sizeof(union nct6694_can_tx).
> > + unsigned char can_idx;
> > + bool tx_busy;
>
> IMHO it makes no sense to have tx_skb and tx_busy
>
> > +};
> > +
> > +static const struct can_bittiming_const nct6694_can_bittiming_nominal_const = {
> > + .name = DRVNAME,
> > + .tseg1_min = 2,
> > + .tseg1_max = 256,
> > + .tseg2_min = 2,
> > + .tseg2_max = 128,
> > + .sjw_max = 128,
> > + .brp_min = 1,
> > + .brp_max = 511,
> > + .brp_inc = 1,
> > +};
> > +
> > +static const struct can_bittiming_const nct6694_can_bittiming_data_const = {
> > + .name = DRVNAME,
> > + .tseg1_min = 1,
> > + .tseg1_max = 32,
> > + .tseg2_min = 1,
> > + .tseg2_max = 16,
> > + .sjw_max = 16,
> > + .brp_min = 1,
> > + .brp_max = 31,
> > + .brp_inc = 1,
> > +};
> > +
> > +static void nct6694_can_clean(struct net_device *ndev)
> > +{
> > + struct nct6694_can_priv *priv = netdev_priv(ndev);
> > +
> > + if (priv->tx_skb || priv->tx_busy)
> > + ndev->stats.tx_errors++;
> > + dev_kfree_skb(priv->tx_skb);
> > + if (priv->tx_busy)
> > + can_free_echo_skb(priv->ndev, 0, NULL);
> > + priv->tx_skb = NULL;
> > + priv->tx_busy = false;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int nct6694_can_get_berr_counter(const struct net_device *ndev,
> > + struct can_berr_counter *bec)
> > +{
> > + struct nct6694_can_priv *priv = netdev_priv(ndev);
> > + struct nct6694_can_event *evt = (struct nct6694_can_event *)priv->rx_buf;
> > + u8 mask = NCT6694_CAN_EVENT_REC | NCT6694_CAN_EVENT_TEC;
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + guard(mutex)(&priv->lock);
> > +
> > + ret = nct6694_read_msg(priv->nct6694, NCT6694_CAN_MOD,
> > + NCT6694_CAN_CMD2_OFFSET(priv->can_idx, mask),
> > + sizeof(struct nct6694_can_event),
> > + evt);
> > + if (ret < 0)
> > + return ret;
> > +
> > + bec->rxerr = priv->can_idx ? evt->rec2 : evt->rec1;
> > + bec->txerr = priv->can_idx ? evt->tec2 : evt->tec1;
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int nct6694_can_handle_lost_msg(struct net_device *ndev)
> > +{
> > + struct net_device_stats *stats = &ndev->stats;
> > + struct sk_buff *skb;
> > + struct can_frame *frame;
> > +
> > + netdev_err(ndev, "RX FIFO overflow, message(s) lost.\n");
> > +
> > + stats->rx_errors++;
> > + stats->rx_over_errors++;
> > +
> > + skb = alloc_can_err_skb(ndev, &frame);
> > + if (unlikely(!skb))
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > + frame->can_id |= CAN_ERR_CRTL;
> > + frame->data[1] = CAN_ERR_CRTL_RX_OVERFLOW;
> > +
> > + netif_receive_skb(skb);
> > +
> > + return 1;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void nct6694_can_read_fifo(struct net_device *ndev)
> > +{
> > + struct nct6694_can_priv *priv = netdev_priv(ndev);
> > + struct nct6694_can_xmit *xmit = (struct nct6694_can_xmit *)priv->rx_buf;
> > + struct net_device_stats *stats = &ndev->stats;
> > + struct canfd_frame *cf;
> > + struct sk_buff *skb;
> > + int can_idx = priv->can_idx;
> > + u32 id;
> > + int ret;
> > + u8 fd_format = 0;
> bool - no need to init
> > +
> > + guard(mutex)(&priv->lock);
> > +
> > + ret = nct6694_read_msg(priv->nct6694, NCT6694_CAN_MOD,
> > + NCT6694_CAN_CMD11_OFFSET(can_idx, 1),
> > + sizeof(struct nct6694_can_xmit), xmit);
> > + if (ret < 0)
> > + return;
> > +
> > + /* Check type of frame and create skb */
> > + fd_format = xmit->flag & NCT6694_CAN_FLAG_FD;
> > + if (fd_format)
> > + skb = alloc_canfd_skb(ndev, &cf);
> > + else
> > + skb = alloc_can_skb(ndev, (struct can_frame **)&cf);
> > +
> > + if (!skb) {
> > + stats->rx_dropped++;
> > + return;
> > + }
> > +
> > + cf->len = xmit->dlc;
>
> what does xmit->dlc contain? The DLC or the length?
+1
Also, do not trust the device data. Even if SPI attacks are less
common, make sure to sanitize this length.
cf->len = canfd_sanitize_len(xmit->dlc);
Or
cf->len = canfd_sanitize_len(xmit->dlc);
if xmit->dlc is in fact a DLC.
> > +
> > + /* Get ID and set flag by its type(Standard ID format or Ext ID format) */
> > + id = le32_to_cpu(xmit->id);
> > + if (xmit->flag & NCT6694_CAN_FLAG_EFF) {
> > + /*
> > + * In case the Extended ID frame is received, the standard
> > + * and extended part of the ID are swapped in the register,
> > + * so swap them back to obtain the correct ID.
> > + */
>
> You comment doesn't match the code.
>
> > + id |= CAN_EFF_FLAG;
> > + }
> > +
> > + cf->can_id = id;
> > +
> > + /* Set ESI flag */
> > + if (xmit->flag & NCT6694_CAN_FLAG_ERR) {
> > + cf->flags |= CANFD_ESI;
> > + netdev_dbg(ndev, "ESI Error\n");
> > + }
> > +
> > + /* Set RTR and BRS */
> > + if (!fd_format && (xmit->flag & NCT6694_CAN_FLAG_RTR)) {
> > + cf->can_id |= CAN_RTR_FLAG;
> > + } else {
> > + if (xmit->flag & NCT6694_CAN_FLAG_BRS)
> > + cf->flags |= CANFD_BRS;
> > +
> > + memcpy(cf->data, xmit->data, cf->len);
> > +
> > + stats->rx_bytes += cf->len;
> > + }
> > +
> > + stats->rx_packets++;
> > +
> > + netif_receive_skb(skb);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int nct6694_can_do_rx_poll(struct net_device *ndev, int quota)
> > +{
> > + struct nct6694_can_priv *priv = netdev_priv(ndev);
> > + struct nct6694_can_event *evt = (struct nct6694_can_event *)priv->rx_buf;
> > + int can_idx = priv->can_idx;
> > + u32 pkts = 0;
> > + u8 mask_rx = NCT6694_CAN_EVENT_RX_EVT;
> > + u8 rx_evt;
> > +
> > + for (;;) {
> > + scoped_guard(mutex, &priv->lock) {
> > + nct6694_read_msg(priv->nct6694, NCT6694_CAN_MOD,
> > + NCT6694_CAN_CMD2_OFFSET(can_idx, mask_rx),
> > + sizeof(struct nct6694_can_event), evt);
> > +
> > + rx_evt = can_idx ? evt->rx_evt2 : evt->rx_evt1;
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (rx_evt & NCT6694_CAN_EVT_RX_DATA_LOST)
> > + nct6694_can_handle_lost_msg(ndev);
> > +
> > + /* No data */
> > + if ((rx_evt & NCT6694_CAN_EVT_RX_DATA_IN) == 0)
> > + break;
> > +
> > + if (quota <= 0)
> > + break;
> > +
> > + nct6694_can_read_fifo(ndev);
> > + quota--;
> > + pkts++;
> > + }
> > +
> > + return pkts;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int nct6694_can_handle_lec_err(struct net_device *ndev, u8 bus_err)
> > +{
> > + struct nct6694_can_priv *priv = netdev_priv(ndev);
> > + struct net_device_stats *stats = &ndev->stats;
> > + struct can_frame *cf;
> > + struct sk_buff *skb;
> > +
> > + if (bus_err == NCT6694_CAN_EVT_NO_ERROR)
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > + priv->can.can_stats.bus_error++;
> > + stats->rx_errors++;
> > +
> > + /* Propagate the error condition to the CAN stack. */
> > + skb = alloc_can_err_skb(ndev, &cf);
> > +
> > + if (unlikely(!skb))
> > + return 0;
Do not exit if the memory allocation fails. Instead, do the error
handling to increase the statistics.
Look at what other CAN drivers are doing.
> > + /* Read the error counter register and check for new errors. */
> > + cf->can_id |= CAN_ERR_PROT | CAN_ERR_BUSERROR;
> > +
> > + switch (bus_err) {
> > + case NCT6694_CAN_EVT_CRC_ERROR:
> > + cf->data[3] = CAN_ERR_PROT_LOC_CRC_SEQ;
> > + break;
> > +
> > + case NCT6694_CAN_EVT_STUFF_ERROR:
> > + cf->data[2] |= CAN_ERR_PROT_STUFF;
> > + break;
> > +
> > + case NCT6694_CAN_EVT_ACK_ERROR:
> > + cf->data[3] = CAN_ERR_PROT_LOC_ACK;
> > + break;
> > +
> > + case NCT6694_CAN_EVT_FORM_ERROR:
> > + cf->data[2] |= CAN_ERR_PROT_FORM;
> > + break;
> > +
> > + case NCT6694_CAN_EVT_BIT_ERROR:
> > + cf->data[2] |= CAN_ERR_PROT_BIT |
> > + CAN_ERR_PROT_BIT0 |
> > + CAN_ERR_PROT_BIT1;
> > + break;
> > +
> > + case NCT6694_CAN_EVT_TIMEOUT_ERROR:
> > + cf->data[2] |= CAN_ERR_PROT_UNSPEC;
> > + break;
> > +
> > + case NCT6694_CAN_EVT_UNKNOWN_ERROR:
> > + cf->data[2] |= CAN_ERR_PROT_UNSPEC;
> > + /*
> > + * It means 'unspecified'(the value is '0').
> > + * But it is not sure if it's ok to send an error package
> > + * without specific error bit.
> > + */
> > + break;
> > +
> > + default:
> > + break;
> > + }
> > +
> > + /* Reset the error counter, ack the IRQ and re-enable the counter. */
> > + stats->rx_packets++;
> > + stats->rx_bytes += cf->can_dlc;
The CAN error frames are not regular packets. Do not increase the RX
stats. Instead, increase the error stats.
> > + netif_receive_skb(skb);
> > +
> > + return 1;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int nct6694_can_handle_state_change(struct net_device *ndev,
> > + enum can_state new_state)
> > +{
> > + struct nct6694_can_priv *priv = netdev_priv(ndev);
> > + struct net_device_stats *stats = &ndev->stats;
> > + struct can_frame *cf;
> > + struct sk_buff *skb;
> > + struct can_berr_counter bec;
> > +
> > + switch (new_state) {
> > + case CAN_STATE_ERROR_ACTIVE:
> > + priv->can.can_stats.error_warning++;
> > + priv->can.state = CAN_STATE_ERROR_ACTIVE;
> > + break;
> > + case CAN_STATE_ERROR_WARNING:
> > + priv->can.can_stats.error_warning++;
> > + priv->can.state = CAN_STATE_ERROR_WARNING;
> > + break;
> > + case CAN_STATE_ERROR_PASSIVE:
> > + priv->can.can_stats.error_passive++;
> > + priv->can.state = CAN_STATE_ERROR_PASSIVE;
> > + break;
> > + case CAN_STATE_BUS_OFF:
> > + priv->can.state = CAN_STATE_BUS_OFF;
> > + priv->can.can_stats.bus_off++;
> > + can_bus_off(ndev);
> > + break;
> > + default:
> > + break;
> > + }
> > +
> > + /* propagate the error condition to the CAN stack */
> > + skb = alloc_can_err_skb(ndev, &cf);
> > + if (unlikely(!skb))
> > + return 0;
Same as above: handle the statistics even if the allocation fails.
> > + nct6694_can_get_berr_counter(ndev, &bec);
> > +
> > + switch (new_state) {
> > + case CAN_STATE_ERROR_WARNING:
> > + /* error warning state */
> > + cf->can_id |= CAN_ERR_CRTL;
> > + cf->data[1] = (bec.txerr > bec.rxerr) ? CAN_ERR_CRTL_TX_WARNING :
> > + CAN_ERR_CRTL_RX_WARNING;
Prefer an if/else here instead of the ternary operator. It is more readable.
> > + cf->data[6] = bec.txerr;
> > + cf->data[7] = bec.rxerr;
> > + break;
> > + case CAN_STATE_ERROR_PASSIVE:
> > + /* error passive state */
> > + cf->can_id |= CAN_ERR_CRTL;
> > + cf->data[1] |= CAN_ERR_CRTL_RX_PASSIVE;
> > + if (bec.txerr > 127)
> > + cf->data[1] |= CAN_ERR_CRTL_TX_PASSIVE;
> > + cf->data[6] = bec.txerr;
> > + cf->data[7] = bec.rxerr;
> > + break;
> > + case CAN_STATE_BUS_OFF:
> > + /* bus-off state */
> > + cf->can_id |= CAN_ERR_BUSOFF;
> > + break;
> > + default:
> > + break;
> > + }
> > +
> > + stats->rx_packets++;
> > + stats->rx_bytes += cf->can_dlc;
Do not increase the RX stats when you receive a CAN event.
> > + netif_receive_skb(skb);
> > +
> > + return 1;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int nct6694_can_handle_state_errors(struct net_device *ndev,
> > + unsigned char can_status)
> > +{
> > + struct nct6694_can_priv *priv = netdev_priv(ndev);
> > + int work_done = 0;
> > +
> > + if (can_status == NCT6694_CAN_EVT_ERROR_ACTIVE &&
> > + priv->can.state != CAN_STATE_ERROR_ACTIVE) {
> > + netdev_dbg(ndev, "Error, entered active state\n");
> > + work_done += nct6694_can_handle_state_change(ndev,
> > + CAN_STATE_ERROR_ACTIVE);
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (can_status == NCT6694_CAN_EVT_WARNING &&
> > + priv->can.state != CAN_STATE_ERROR_WARNING) {
> > + netdev_dbg(ndev, "Error, entered warning state\n");
> > + work_done += nct6694_can_handle_state_change(ndev,
> > + CAN_STATE_ERROR_WARNING);
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (can_status == NCT6694_CAN_EVT_ERROR_PASSIVE &&
> > + priv->can.state != CAN_STATE_ERROR_PASSIVE) {
> > + netdev_dbg(ndev, "Error, entered passive state\n");
> > + work_done += nct6694_can_handle_state_change(ndev,
> > + CAN_STATE_ERROR_PASSIVE);
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (can_status == NCT6694_CAN_EVT_BUS_OFF &&
> > + priv->can.state != CAN_STATE_BUS_OFF) {
> > + netdev_dbg(ndev, "Error, entered bus-off state\n");
> > + work_done += nct6694_can_handle_state_change(ndev,
> > + CAN_STATE_BUS_OFF);
> > + }
> > +
> > + return work_done;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int nct6694_can_poll(struct net_device *ndev, int quota)
> > +{
> > + struct nct6694_can_priv *priv = netdev_priv(ndev);
> > + struct nct6694_can_event *evt = (struct nct6694_can_event *)priv->rx_buf;
> > + int can_idx = priv->can_idx;
> > + int work_done = 0, ret;
> > + u8 evt_mask = NCT6694_CAN_EVENT_ERR | NCT6694_CAN_EVENT_STATUS;
> > + u8 bus_err, can_status;
> > +
> > + scoped_guard(mutex, &priv->lock) {
> > + ret = nct6694_read_msg(priv->nct6694, NCT6694_CAN_MOD,
> > + NCT6694_CAN_CMD2_OFFSET(can_idx, evt_mask),
> > + sizeof(struct nct6694_can_event), evt);
> > + if (ret < 0)
> > + return IRQ_NONE;
>
> propagate the error
>
> > +
> > + if (can_idx) {
> > + bus_err = evt->err2;
> > + can_status = evt->status2;
> > + } else {
> > + bus_err = evt->err1;
> > + can_status = evt->status1;
> > + }
> > + }
> > +
> > + /* Handle bus state changes */
> > + work_done += nct6694_can_handle_state_errors(ndev, can_status);
> > +
> > + /* Handle lec errors on the bus */
> > + if (priv->can.ctrlmode & CAN_CTRLMODE_BERR_REPORTING)
> > + work_done += nct6694_can_handle_lec_err(ndev, bus_err);
> > +
> > + /* Handle RX events */
> > + work_done += nct6694_can_do_rx_poll(ndev, quota - work_done);
> > + return work_done;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void nct6694_can_tx_irq(struct net_device *ndev)
> > +{
> > + struct nct6694_can_priv *priv = netdev_priv(ndev);
> > + struct net_device_stats *stats = &ndev->stats;
> > +
> > + guard(mutex)(&priv->lock);
> > + stats->tx_bytes += can_get_echo_skb(ndev, 0, NULL);
> > + stats->tx_packets++;
> > + priv->tx_busy = false;
> > + netif_wake_queue(ndev);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static irqreturn_t nct6694_can_irq(int irq, void *data)
> > +{
> > + struct net_device *ndev = data;
> > + struct nct6694_can_priv *priv = netdev_priv(ndev);
> > + struct nct6694_can_event *evt = (struct nct6694_can_event *)priv->rx_buf;
> > + int can_idx = priv->can_idx;
> > + int ret;
> > + u8 mask_sts = NCT6694_CAN_EVENT_TX_EVT;
> > + u8 tx_evt;
> > +
> > + scoped_guard(mutex, &priv->lock) {
> > + ret = nct6694_read_msg(priv->nct6694, NCT6694_CAN_MOD,
> > + NCT6694_CAN_CMD2_OFFSET(can_idx, mask_sts),
> > + sizeof(struct nct6694_can_event), evt);
> > + if (ret < 0)
> > + return IRQ_NONE;
> > +
> > + tx_evt = can_idx ? evt->tx_evt2 : evt->tx_evt1;
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (tx_evt) {
> > + nct6694_can_tx_irq(ndev);
> > + } else {
> > + ret = nct6694_can_poll(ndev, NCT6694_CAN_RX_QUOTA);
> > + if (!ret)
> > + return IRQ_NONE;
> > + }
> > +
> > + return IRQ_HANDLED;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int nct6694_can_start(struct net_device *ndev)
> > +{
> > + struct nct6694_can_priv *priv = netdev_priv(ndev);
> > + struct nct6694_can_setting *setting = (struct nct6694_can_setting *)priv->tx_buf;
> > + const struct can_bittiming *n_bt = &priv->can.bittiming;
> > + const struct can_bittiming *d_bt = &priv->can.data_bittiming;
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + guard(mutex)(&priv->lock);
> > +
> > + memset(priv->tx_buf, 0, sizeof(struct nct6694_can_setting));
When you memset(), use this pattern:
memset(setting, 0, sizeof(*setting));
Apply this throughout your driver.
> > + setting->nbr = cpu_to_le32(n_bt->bitrate);
> > + setting->dbr = cpu_to_le32(d_bt->bitrate);
> > +
> > + if (priv->can.ctrlmode & CAN_CTRLMODE_LISTENONLY)
> > + setting->ctrl1 |= cpu_to_le16(NCT6694_CAN_CTRL1_MON);
> > +
> > + if ((priv->can.ctrlmode & CAN_CTRLMODE_FD) &&
> > + priv->can.ctrlmode & CAN_CTRLMODE_FD_NON_ISO)
> > + setting->ctrl1 |= cpu_to_le16(NCT6694_CAN_CTRL1_NISO);
> > +
> > + if (priv->can.ctrlmode & CAN_CTRLMODE_LOOPBACK)
> > + setting->ctrl1 |= cpu_to_le16(NCT6694_CAN_CTRL1_LBCK);
> > +
> > + ret = nct6694_write_msg(priv->nct6694, NCT6694_CAN_MOD,
> > + NCT6694_CAN_CMD0_OFFSET(priv->can_idx),
> > + sizeof(struct nct6694_can_setting), setting);
> > + if (ret < 0)
> > + return ret;
> > +
> > + priv->can.state = CAN_STATE_ERROR_ACTIVE;
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int nct6694_can_stop(struct net_device *ndev)
> > +{
> > + struct nct6694_can_priv *priv = netdev_priv(ndev);
> > +
> > + netif_stop_queue(ndev);
> > + free_irq(ndev->irq, ndev);
> > + destroy_workqueue(priv->wq);
> > + priv->wq = NULL;
> > + nct6694_can_clean(ndev);
> > + priv->can.state = CAN_STATE_STOPPED;
> > + close_candev(ndev);
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int nct6694_can_set_mode(struct net_device *ndev, enum can_mode mode)
> > +{
> > + switch (mode) {
> > + case CAN_MODE_START:
> > + nct6694_can_clean(ndev);
> > + nct6694_can_start(ndev);
> > + netif_wake_queue(ndev);
> > + break;
> > + default:
> > + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > + }
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int nct6694_can_open(struct net_device *ndev)
> > +{
> > + struct nct6694_can_priv *priv = netdev_priv(ndev);
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + ret = open_candev(ndev);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return ret;
> > +
> > + ret = request_threaded_irq(ndev->irq, NULL,
> > + nct6694_can_irq, IRQF_ONESHOT,
> > + "nct6694_can", ndev);
> > + if (ret) {
> > + netdev_err(ndev, "Failed to request IRQ\n");
> > + goto close_candev;
> > + }
> > +
> > + priv->wq = alloc_ordered_workqueue("%s-nct6694_wq",
> > + WQ_FREEZABLE | WQ_MEM_RECLAIM,
> > + ndev->name);
> > + if (!priv->wq) {
> > + ret = -ENOMEM;
> > + goto free_irq;
> > + }
> > +
> > + priv->tx_skb = NULL;
> > + priv->tx_busy = false;
> > +
> > + ret = nct6694_can_start(ndev);
> > + if (ret)
> > + goto destroy_wq;
> > +
> > + netif_start_queue(ndev);
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > +destroy_wq:
> > + destroy_workqueue(priv->wq);
> > +free_irq:
> > + free_irq(ndev->irq, ndev);
> > +close_candev:
> > + close_candev(ndev);
> > + return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static netdev_tx_t nct6694_can_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb,
> > + struct net_device *ndev)
> > +{
> > + struct nct6694_can_priv *priv = netdev_priv(ndev);
> > +
> > + if (priv->tx_skb || priv->tx_busy) {
> > + netdev_err(ndev, "hard_xmit called while tx busy\n");
> > + return NETDEV_TX_BUSY;
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (can_dev_dropped_skb(ndev, skb))
> > + return NETDEV_TX_OK;
>
> please drop first
>
> > +
> > + netif_stop_queue(ndev);
> > + priv->tx_skb = skb;
> > + queue_work(priv->wq, &priv->tx_work);
> > +
> > + return NETDEV_TX_OK;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void nct6694_can_tx(struct net_device *ndev, struct canfd_frame *cf)
> > +{
> > + struct nct6694_can_priv *priv = netdev_priv(ndev);
> > + struct nct6694_can_xmit *xmit = (struct nct6694_can_xmit *)priv->tx_buf;
> > + u32 txid = 0;
> > +
> > + memset(xmit, 0, sizeof(struct nct6694_can_xmit));
> > +
> > + if (priv->can_idx == 0)
> > + xmit->tag = NCT6694_CAN_TAG_CAN0<;
> > + else
> > + xmit->tag = NCT6694_CAN_TAG_CAN1;
> > +
> > + if (cf->can_id & CAN_EFF_FLAG) {
> > + txid = cf->can_id & CAN_EFF_MASK;
> > + /*
> > + * In case the Extended ID frame is transmitted, the
> > + * standard and extended part of the ID are swapped
> > + * in the register, so swap them back to send the
> > + * correct ID.
>
> You comment doesn't match the code.
>
> > + */
> > + xmit->flag |= NCT6694_CAN_FLAG_EFF;
> > + } else {
> > + txid = cf->can_id & CAN_SFF_MASK;
> > + }
> > +
> > + xmit->id = cpu_to_le32(txid);
> > + xmit->dlc = cf->len;
> > +
> > + if ((priv->can.ctrlmode & CAN_CTRLMODE_FD) &&
>
> No need to check ctrlmode
>
> > + can_is_canfd_skb(priv->tx_skb)) {
> > + xmit->flag |= NCT6694_CAN_FLAG_FD;
> > + if (cf->flags & CANFD_BRS)
> > + xmit->flag |= NCT6694_CAN_FLAG_BRS;
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (cf->can_id & CAN_RTR_FLAG)
> > + xmit->flag |= NCT6694_CAN_FLAG_RTR;
>
> you can move this into the !can_is_canfd_skb branch of the if
>
> > +
> > + memcpy(xmit->data, cf->data, cf->len);
> > +
> > + nct6694_write_msg(priv->nct6694, NCT6694_CAN_MOD,
> > + NCT6694_CAN_CMD10_OFFSET(1),
> > + sizeof(struct nct6694_can_xmit),
> > + xmit);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void nct6694_can_tx_work(struct work_struct *work)
> > +{
> > + struct nct6694_can_priv *priv = container_of(work,
> > + struct nct6694_can_priv,
> > + tx_work);
> > + struct net_device *ndev = priv->ndev;
> > + struct canfd_frame *cf;
> > +
> > + guard(mutex)(&priv->lock);
> > +
> > + if (priv->tx_skb) {
> > + if (priv->can.state == CAN_STATE_BUS_OFF) {
> > + nct6694_can_clean(ndev);
> > + } else {
> > + cf = (struct canfd_frame *)priv->tx_skb->data;
> > + nct6694_can_tx(ndev, cf);
> > + priv->tx_busy = true;
> > + can_put_echo_skb(priv->tx_skb, ndev, 0, 0);
> > + priv->tx_skb = NULL;
> > + }
> > + }
> > +}
> > +
> > +static const struct net_device_ops nct6694_can_netdev_ops = {
> > + .ndo_open = nct6694_can_open,
> > + .ndo_stop = nct6694_can_stop,
> > + .ndo_start_xmit = nct6694_can_start_xmit,
> > + .ndo_change_mtu = can_change_mtu,
> > +};
> > +
> > +static const struct ethtool_ops nct6694_can_ethtool_ops = {
> > + .get_ts_info = ethtool_op_get_ts_info,
> > +};
> > +
> > +static int nct6694_can_get_clock(struct nct6694_can_priv *priv)
> > +{
> > + struct nct6694_can_information *info = (struct nct6694_can_information *)priv->rx_buf;
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + ret = nct6694_read_msg(priv->nct6694, NCT6694_CAN_MOD,
> > + NCT6694_CAN_CMD1_OFFSET,
> > + sizeof(struct nct6694_can_information),
> > + info);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return ret;
> > +
> > + return le32_to_cpu(info->can_clk);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int nct6694_can_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > +{
> > + const struct mfd_cell *cell = mfd_get_cell(pdev);
> > + struct nct6694 *nct6694 = dev_get_drvdata(pdev->dev.parent);
> > + struct nct6694_can_priv *priv;
> > + struct net_device *ndev;
> > + int ret, irq, can_clk;
> > +
> > + irq = irq_create_mapping(nct6694->domain,
> > + NCT6694_IRQ_CAN1 + cell->id);
> > + if (!irq)
> > + return -EINVAL;
>
> propagate error value
>
> > +
> > + ndev = alloc_candev(sizeof(struct nct6694_can_priv), 1);
> > + if (!ndev)
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > + ndev->irq = irq;
> > + ndev->flags |= IFF_ECHO;
> > + ndev->netdev_ops = &nct6694_can_netdev_ops;
> > + ndev->ethtool_ops = &nct6694_can_ethtool_ops;
> > +
> > + priv = netdev_priv(ndev);
> > + priv->nct6694 = nct6694;
> > + priv->ndev = ndev;
> > +
> > + priv->tx_buf = devm_kcalloc(&pdev->dev, NCT6694_MAX_PACKET_SZ,
> > + sizeof(unsigned char), GFP_KERNEL);
>
> devm_kzalloc()
> > + if (!priv->tx_buf) {
> > + ret = -ENOMEM;
> > + goto free_candev;
> > + }
> > +
> > + priv->rx_buf = devm_kcalloc(&pdev->dev, NCT6694_MAX_PACKET_SZ,
> > + sizeof(unsigned char), GFP_KERNEL);
> devm_kzalloc()
>
> > + if (!priv->rx_buf) {
> > + ret = -ENOMEM;
> > + goto free_candev;
> > + }
> > +
> > + can_clk = nct6694_can_get_clock(priv);
> > + if (can_clk < 0) {
> > + ret = -EIO;
>
> propagate the error value, don't overwrite it
>
> move the dev_err_probe() here.
>
> > + goto free_candev;
> > + }
> > +
> > + mutex_init(&priv->lock);
> > + INIT_WORK(&priv->tx_work, nct6694_can_tx_work);
> > +
> > + priv->can_idx = cell->id;
> > + priv->can.state = CAN_STATE_STOPPED;
> > + priv->can.clock.freq = can_clk;
> > + priv->can.bittiming_const = &nct6694_can_bittiming_nominal_const;
> > + priv->can.data_bittiming_const = &nct6694_can_bittiming_data_const;
> > + priv->can.do_set_mode = nct6694_can_set_mode;
> > + priv->can.do_get_berr_counter = nct6694_can_get_berr_counter;
> > +
> > + priv->can.ctrlmode = CAN_CTRLMODE_FD;
> > +
> > + priv->can.ctrlmode_supported = CAN_CTRLMODE_LOOPBACK |
> > + CAN_CTRLMODE_LISTENONLY |
> > + CAN_CTRLMODE_FD |
> > + CAN_CTRLMODE_FD_NON_ISO |
> > + CAN_CTRLMODE_BERR_REPORTING;
> > +
> > + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, priv);
> > + SET_NETDEV_DEV(priv->ndev, &pdev->dev);
> > +
> > + ret = register_candev(priv->ndev);
> > + if (ret)
> > + goto free_candev;
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > +free_candev:
> > + free_candev(ndev);
> > + return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, ret, "Probe failed\n");
>
> Move the dev_err_probe() with an appropriate error message to where the
> error occurs. If malloc fails, the kernel already prints for you, so
> here it's only nct6694_can_get_clock() only.
>
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void nct6694_can_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > +{
> > + struct nct6694_can_priv *priv = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> > +
> > + cancel_work_sync(&priv->tx_work);
> > + unregister_candev(priv->ndev);
> > + free_candev(priv->ndev);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static struct platform_driver nct6694_can_driver = {
> > + .driver = {
> > + .name = DRVNAME,
> > + },
> > + .probe = nct6694_can_probe,
> > + .remove = nct6694_can_remove,
> > +};
> > +
> > +module_platform_driver(nct6694_can_driver);
> > +
> > +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("USB-CAN FD driver for NCT6694");
> > +MODULE_AUTHOR("Ming Yu <tmyu0@xxxxxxxxxxx>");
> > +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
> > +MODULE_ALIAS("platform:nct6694-can");
Yours sincerely,
Vincent Mailhol
Re: [PATCH v3 4/7] can: Add Nuvoton NCT6694 CAN support
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/7] can: Add Nuvoton NCT6694 CAN support
- From: Vincent Mailhol <mailhol.vincent@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2024 00:25:09 +0900
- In-reply-to: <20241211-taupe-leech-of-respect-4c325a-mkl@pengutronix.de>
- References: <20241210104524.2466586-1-tmyu0@nuvoton.com> <20241210104524.2466586-5-tmyu0@nuvoton.com> <20241211-taupe-leech-of-respect-4c325a-mkl@pengutronix.de>
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH v3 4/7] can: Add Nuvoton NCT6694 CAN support
- From: Ming Yu
- Re: [PATCH v3 4/7] can: Add Nuvoton NCT6694 CAN support
- References:
- [PATCH v3 0/7] Add Nuvoton NCT6694 MFD drivers
- From: Ming Yu
- [PATCH v3 4/7] can: Add Nuvoton NCT6694 CAN support
- From: Ming Yu
- Re: [PATCH v3 4/7] can: Add Nuvoton NCT6694 CAN support
- From: Marc Kleine-Budde
- [PATCH v3 0/7] Add Nuvoton NCT6694 MFD drivers
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 4/4] gpio: tqmx86: add support for changing GPIO directions
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v3 07/13] dt-bindings: clock: Add SAMA7D65 PMC compatible string
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH v3 4/7] can: Add Nuvoton NCT6694 CAN support
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH v3 4/7] can: Add Nuvoton NCT6694 CAN support
- Index(es):
 |