On Tue, Nov 19, 2024 at 7:51 AM Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Thanks for your work, this really improves the bindings. My pleasure! > > On a related note: we still have some uses of deprecated distutils in > the code. Do you know how we should replace LooseVersion to not use it > anymore? > I can look into this. Should we create an issue in the GH repo to track this?
Re: [libgpiod][PATCH v2 00/23] bindings: python: conform to mypy and ruff linter recommendations
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [libgpiod][PATCH v2 00/23] bindings: python: conform to mypy and ruff linter recommendations
- From: Vincent Fazio <vfazio@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2024 07:56:49 -0600
- In-reply-to: <CAMRc=Me9qD-VRr-JSXfFkE2O4xUhoKBSo5ug-nyw0b4wkQ7WrQ@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <20241114145116.2123714-1-vfazio@xes-inc.com> <CAMRc=Me9qD-VRr-JSXfFkE2O4xUhoKBSo5ug-nyw0b4wkQ7WrQ@mail.gmail.com>
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [libgpiod][PATCH v2 00/23] bindings: python: conform to mypy and ruff linter recommendations
- From: Bartosz Golaszewski
- Re: [libgpiod][PATCH v2 00/23] bindings: python: conform to mypy and ruff linter recommendations
- References:
- [libgpiod][PATCH v2 00/23] bindings: python: conform to mypy and ruff linter recommendations
- From: Vincent Fazio
- Re: [libgpiod][PATCH v2 00/23] bindings: python: conform to mypy and ruff linter recommendations
- From: Bartosz Golaszewski
- [libgpiod][PATCH v2 00/23] bindings: python: conform to mypy and ruff linter recommendations
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v6 4/7] pinctrl: s32: convert the driver into an mfd cell
- Next by Date: Re: [libgpiod][PATCH v2 00/23] bindings: python: conform to mypy and ruff linter recommendations
- Previous by thread: Re: [libgpiod][PATCH v2 00/23] bindings: python: conform to mypy and ruff linter recommendations
- Next by thread: Re: [libgpiod][PATCH v2 00/23] bindings: python: conform to mypy and ruff linter recommendations
- Index(es):
 |