Re: [PATCH 135/182] MIPS: alchemy: switch to gpiochip_add_data()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 10:44 PM, Manuel Lauss <manuel.lauss@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 2:39 PM, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> ---
>> Ralf: please ACK this so I can take it through the GPIO tree.
>> BTW: would be nice if the MIPS GPIO drivers could move down
>> to drivers/gpio in the long run.
>
> Is there a specific reason?  I have no objections to moving it, but
> on the other hand I also like that (in this case) most/all chip-specific
> code is grouped together and not scattered around the tree.

Here is a reason. This patch series. If I could just change all that and have
the dependencies inside the GPIO tree, refactoring struggles would be
so much easier.

Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux