Re: [GIT PULL] intel-pinctrl for 6.13-1

[Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Fri, Nov 01, 2024 at 11:30:48PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 1, 2024 at 1:09 PM Mika Westerberg
> <mika.westerberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 01, 2024 at 12:43:07PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> > > Hi Andy,
> > >
> > > On Fri, Nov 1, 2024 at 11:21 AM Andy Shevchenko
> > > <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > > One of the tiniest PR for Intel pin control drivers, only two changes there
> > > > which were in the Linux Next for some time without reported issues. Please,
> > > > pull for v6.13-rc1 (next cycle).
> > > (...)
> > > > The following changes since commit 42f7652d3eb527d03665b09edac47f85fb600924:
> > > >
> > > >   Linux 6.12-rc4 (2024-10-20 15:19:38 -0700)
> > >
> > > Does this require stuff from rc4 or can you send it based on rc1?
> > >
> > > I know we added some ACPI ID or so for rc4 but ... that's only
> > > required at runtime right? Are there hard compile-time or
> > > textual dependencies?
> >
> > It does not strictly depend on -rc4 but is that a problem pulling from
> > something that is based on > -rc1? I mean this is what we do all the
> > time in TB/USB side of things and typically apply first patches to
> > "next" branch on top of what was the -rcX at the moment.
> 
> I usually do not pull in later release candidates unless it is necessary,
> if it is necessary then I do it, such as if there will be merge conflicts unless
> I pull it in.

Okay, thanks. We'll rebase this on top of -rc1 and resend the pull
request.