On 12/09/2015 06:30 AM, Linus Walleij wrote: > This makes the driver use the data pointer added to the gpio_chip > to store a pointer to the state container instead of relying on > container_of(). This looks like it's fine, but I wonder what is the justification for the change? It might be good to mention that in the commit description. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH 092/182] pinctrl: bcm2835: use gpiochip data pointer
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH 092/182] pinctrl: bcm2835: use gpiochip data pointer
- From: Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 22:20:48 -0700
- In-reply-to: <1449667836-1932-1-git-send-email-linus.walleij@linaro.org>
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 092/182] pinctrl: bcm2835: use gpiochip data pointer
- From: Linus Walleij
- Re: [PATCH 092/182] pinctrl: bcm2835: use gpiochip data pointer
- References:
- [PATCH 092/182] pinctrl: bcm2835: use gpiochip data pointer
- From: Linus Walleij
- [PATCH 092/182] pinctrl: bcm2835: use gpiochip data pointer
- Prev by Date: Re: [v3,1/6] pinctrl: qcom: ipq4019: Add IPQ4019 pinctrl support
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 112/182] pinctrl: samsung: use gpiochip data pointer
- Previous by thread: [PATCH 092/182] pinctrl: bcm2835: use gpiochip data pointer
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 092/182] pinctrl: bcm2835: use gpiochip data pointer
- Index(es):
 |