On Wed, Oct 16, 2024 at 09:50:58AM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > On Wed, Oct 16, 2024 at 9:27 AM Kent Gibson <warthog618@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Oct 16, 2024 at 01:19:44PM +0800, Kent Gibson wrote: > > > On Tue, Oct 15, 2024 at 12:56:18PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > > > > From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > > > - return gpio_do_set_config(guard.gc, gpio_chip_hwgpio(desc), config); > > > > + ret = gpio_do_set_config(guard.gc, gpio_chip_hwgpio(desc), config); > > > > + if (ret == 0) { > > > > + /* These are the only options we notify the userspace about. */ > > > > + switch (pinconf_to_config_param(config)) { > > > > + case PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_DISABLE: > > > > + case PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_PULL_DOWN: > > > > + case PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_PULL_UP: > > > > + case PIN_CONFIG_DRIVE_OPEN_DRAIN: > > > > + case PIN_CONFIG_DRIVE_OPEN_SOURCE: > > > > + case PIN_CONFIG_DRIVE_PUSH_PULL: > > > > + case PIN_CONFIG_INPUT_DEBOUNCE: > > > > + gpiod_line_state_notify(desc, > > > > + GPIO_V2_LINE_CHANGED_CONFIG); > > > > + break; > > > > + default: > > > > + break; > > > > + } > > > > + } > > > > + > > > > + return ret; > > > > } > > > > > > Ah, the debounce - I forgot about that, and other features that cdev > > > might emulate. > > > > > > What happens if userspace requests a line with debounce that is > > > supported by hardware? Seems to me we'll see both a LINE_REQUESTED and a > > > LINE_CONFIG_CHANGED when the line is requested. > > > > > > > This is problematic for me to test at the moment, as gpiosim doesn't support > > debounce. Any chance we could make that configurable? Similarly drive. > > > > > Conversely, what if a config change impacts features that don't result in a > > > notification from gpiod_set_config(), like active low, or emulated > > > drive or debounce? > > > > > > > Bah, drive is emulated in gpiolib itself, so that should be fine. > > > > When changing config cdev always calls gpiod_direction_input/output(), so I > > think that covers the active low case. > > > > But I have a test taking a line from input to output|open_drain and I > > get two change events. The first is the most interesting as it reports > > input|open_drain, the second then reports output|open_drain. > > That is due to gpiod_direction_output() calling gpiod_set_config() to > > No, it never calls gpiod_set_config() but gpio_set_config() which > never emits an event. > Depends whether the driver supports drive or not. If it does then line 2858: ret = gpio_set_config(desc, PIN_CONFIG_DRIVE_OPEN_DRAIN); will emit. So your _nonotify function is calling a bunch of functions that can emit. Cheers, Kent.