> Convert th1520_pinctrl_dt_node_to_map() to use guarded mutex for > thp->mutex. How does the proposed usage of the programming interface “for_each_available_child_of_node_scoped” fit to such a change description? Would you like to omit the first word “to” from the summary phrase? Would you generally like to increase the application of scope-based resource management (also in this software area)? Regards, Markus