Hello Bart,
On Mon, Sep 30, 2024 at 11:11:11AM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-mvebu.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-mvebu.c
> index 8cfd3a89c018..5ffb332e9849 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-mvebu.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-mvebu.c
> @@ -794,8 +794,8 @@ static int mvebu_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev,
> u32 set;
>
> if (mvchip->soc_variant == MVEBU_GPIO_SOC_VARIANT_A8K) {
> - int ret = of_property_read_u32(dev->of_node,
> - "marvell,pwm-offset", &offset);
> + int ret = device_property_read_u32(dev, "marvell,pwm-offset",
> + &offset);
> if (ret < 0)
> return 0;
> } else {
> @@ -1106,7 +1106,7 @@ static int mvebu_gpio_probe_syscon(struct platform_device *pdev,
> if (IS_ERR(mvchip->regs))
> return PTR_ERR(mvchip->regs);
>
> - if (of_property_read_u32(pdev->dev.of_node, "offset", &mvchip->offset))
> + if (device_property_read_u32(&pdev->dev, "offset", &mvchip->offset))
> return -EINVAL;
>
> return 0;
> @@ -1147,7 +1147,7 @@ static int mvebu_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> platform_set_drvdata(pdev, mvchip);
>
> - if (of_property_read_u32(pdev->dev.of_node, "ngpios", &ngpios)) {
> + if (device_property_read_u32(&pdev->dev, "ngpios", &ngpios)) {
> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Missing ngpios OF property\n");
> return -ENODEV;
> }
I didn't look closely, but I wonder if GPIO_MVEBU depending on OF_GPIO
can be softened with this change?!
Best regards
Uwe
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
