Hi Linus, On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 2:38 PM, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > We're planning to remove the gpiochip_add() function to swith > to gpiochip_add_data() with NULL for data argument. Just wondering, and I don't think this was clarified in the cover letter (I'm not subscribed to linux-gpio, so I used a web archive): why don't you keep gpiochip_add() as an inline wrapper around gpiochip_add_data()? That would avoid conversions like this one. Thanks! Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html