From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@xxxxxxxxxx> On Wed, 28 Aug 2024 15:32:07 +0200, Parth Pancholi wrote: > On a few platforms such as TI's AM69 device, disable_irq() > fails to keep track of the interrupts that happen between > disable_irq() and enable_irq() and those interrupts are missed. > Use the ->irq_unmask() and ->irq_mask() methods instead > of ->irq_enable() and ->irq_disable() to correctly keep track of > edges when disable_irq is called. > This solves the issue of disable_irq() not working as expected > on such platforms. > > [...] A couple hints: Keerthy: Don't quote your tags as b4 will not pick it up. Parth: Don't wrap the commit message lines too eagerly as it actually makes it less readable. Applied for fixes, thanks! [1/1] gpio: davinci: fix lazy disable commit: 3360d41f4ac490282fddc3ccc0b58679aa5c065d Best regards, -- Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@xxxxxxxxxx>