On Sat, Sep 28, 2024 at 09:47:37PM +0200, Javier Carrasco wrote: > Switch to device_for_each_child_node_scoped() to simplify the code by > removing the need for a call to fwnode_handle_put() in the error path. > > This also prevents possible memory leaks if new error paths are added > without the required call to fwnode_handle_put(). Pushed to my review and testing queue, thanks! -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
Re: [PATCH 3/3] gpio: acpi: switch to device_for_each_child_node_scoped()
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] gpio: acpi: switch to device_for_each_child_node_scoped()
- From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2024 14:23:10 +0300
- In-reply-to: <20240928-gpio_device_for_each_child_node_scoped-v1-3-c20eff315f4f@gmail.com>
- Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo
- References: <20240928-gpio_device_for_each_child_node_scoped-v1-0-c20eff315f4f@gmail.com> <20240928-gpio_device_for_each_child_node_scoped-v1-3-c20eff315f4f@gmail.com>
- References:
- [PATCH 0/3] gpio: switch to device_for_each_chilld_node_scoped()
- From: Javier Carrasco
- [PATCH 3/3] gpio: acpi: switch to device_for_each_child_node_scoped()
- From: Javier Carrasco
- [PATCH 0/3] gpio: switch to device_for_each_chilld_node_scoped()
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 2/3] gpio: sim: switch to device_for_each_child_node_scoped()
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 2/3] gpio: syscon: use generic device properties
- Previous by thread: [PATCH 3/3] gpio: acpi: switch to device_for_each_child_node_scoped()
- Next by thread: Re: (subset) [PATCH 0/3] gpio: switch to device_for_each_chilld_node_scoped()
- Index(es):
 |