From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@xxxxxxxxxx> On Thu, 19 Sep 2024 15:51:04 +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > If we remove a GPIO chip that is also an interrupt controller with users > not having freed some interrupts, we'll end up leaking resources as > indicated by the following warning: > > remove_proc_entry: removing non-empty directory 'irq/30', leaking at least 'gpio' > > As there's no way of notifying interrupt users about the irqchip going > away and the interrupt subsystem is not plugged into the driver model and > so not all cases can be handled by devlinks, we need to make sure to free > all interrupts before the complete the removal of the provider. > > [...] Applied, thanks! [1/1] gpio: free irqs that are still requested when the chip is being removed commit: ec8b6f55b98146c41dcf15e8189eb43291e35e89 Best regards, -- Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@xxxxxxxxxx>