On Fri, 2024-08-30 at 11:40 +0800, Billy Tsai wrote: > The bank array name is only used to determine if the GPIO offset is valid, > and this condition can be replaced by checking if the offset exceeds the > ngpio property. > > Signed-off-by: Billy Tsai <billy_tsai@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/gpio/gpio-aspeed.c | 17 ++++------------- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-aspeed.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-aspeed.c > index 04c03402db6d..24f50a0ea4ab 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-aspeed.c > +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-aspeed.c > @@ -77,7 +77,6 @@ struct aspeed_gpio_bank { > uint16_t debounce_regs; > uint16_t tolerance_regs; > uint16_t cmdsrc_regs; > - const char names[4][3]; > }; > > /* > @@ -104,7 +103,6 @@ static const struct aspeed_gpio_bank aspeed_gpio_banks[] = { > .debounce_regs = 0x0040, > .tolerance_regs = 0x001c, > .cmdsrc_regs = 0x0060, > - .names = { "A", "B", "C", "D" }, > }, > { > .val_regs = 0x0020, > @@ -113,7 +111,6 @@ static const struct aspeed_gpio_bank aspeed_gpio_banks[] = { > .debounce_regs = 0x0048, > .tolerance_regs = 0x003c, > .cmdsrc_regs = 0x0068, > - .names = { "E", "F", "G", "H" }, > }, > { > .val_regs = 0x0070, > @@ -122,7 +119,6 @@ static const struct aspeed_gpio_bank aspeed_gpio_banks[] = { > .debounce_regs = 0x00b0, > .tolerance_regs = 0x00ac, > .cmdsrc_regs = 0x0090, > - .names = { "I", "J", "K", "L" }, > }, > { > .val_regs = 0x0078, > @@ -131,7 +127,6 @@ static const struct aspeed_gpio_bank aspeed_gpio_banks[] = { > .debounce_regs = 0x0100, > .tolerance_regs = 0x00fc, > .cmdsrc_regs = 0x00e0, > - .names = { "M", "N", "O", "P" }, > }, > { > .val_regs = 0x0080, > @@ -140,7 +135,6 @@ static const struct aspeed_gpio_bank aspeed_gpio_banks[] = { > .debounce_regs = 0x0130, > .tolerance_regs = 0x012c, > .cmdsrc_regs = 0x0110, > - .names = { "Q", "R", "S", "T" }, > }, > { > .val_regs = 0x0088, > @@ -149,7 +143,6 @@ static const struct aspeed_gpio_bank aspeed_gpio_banks[] = { > .debounce_regs = 0x0160, > .tolerance_regs = 0x015c, > .cmdsrc_regs = 0x0140, > - .names = { "U", "V", "W", "X" }, > }, > { > .val_regs = 0x01E0, > @@ -158,7 +151,6 @@ static const struct aspeed_gpio_bank aspeed_gpio_banks[] = { > .debounce_regs = 0x0190, > .tolerance_regs = 0x018c, > .cmdsrc_regs = 0x0170, > - .names = { "Y", "Z", "AA", "AB" }, > }, > { > .val_regs = 0x01e8, > @@ -167,7 +159,6 @@ static const struct aspeed_gpio_bank aspeed_gpio_banks[] = { > .debounce_regs = 0x01c0, > .tolerance_regs = 0x01bc, > .cmdsrc_regs = 0x01a0, > - .names = { "AC", "", "", "" }, > }, > }; > > @@ -280,11 +271,11 @@ static inline const struct aspeed_bank_props *find_bank_props( > static inline bool have_gpio(struct aspeed_gpio *gpio, unsigned int offset) > { > const struct aspeed_bank_props *props = find_bank_props(gpio, offset); > - const struct aspeed_gpio_bank *bank = to_bank(offset); > - unsigned int group = GPIO_OFFSET(offset) / 8; > > - return bank->names[group][0] != '\0' && > - (!props || ((props->input | props->output) & GPIO_BIT(offset))); > + if (offset > gpio->chip.ngpio) Should this be `>=`? ngpio is a count. Andrew > + return false; > + > + return (!props || ((props->input | props->output) & GPIO_BIT(offset))); > } > > static inline bool have_input(struct aspeed_gpio *gpio, unsigned int offset)