Re: [PATCH v2 16/21] dt-bindings: spi: document support for SA8255p

[Nikunj Kela <quic_nkela@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 9/4/2024 6:21 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 04/09/2024 14:48, Nikunj Kela wrote:
>> On 9/3/2024 11:34 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> On Tue, Sep 03, 2024 at 03:02:35PM -0700, Nikunj Kela wrote:
>>>> Add compatible representing spi support on SA8255p.
>>>>
>>>> Clocks and interconnects are being configured in firmware VM
>>>> on SA8255p platform, therefore making them optional.
>>>>
>>> Please use standard email subjects, so with the PATCH keyword in the
>>> title.  helps here to create proper versioned patches.
>> Where did I miss PATCH keyword in the subject here? It says "[PATCH v2
>> 16/21] dt-bindings: spi: document support for SA8255p"
> Oh, wrong template. It was about spi prefix, 

These are the latest 4 commits in linux-next for spi:

12736adc43b7 dt-bindings: spi: nxp-fspi: add imx8ulp support
b0cdf9cc0895 spi: dt-bindings: Add rockchip,rk3576-spi compatible
d6d0af1b9eff dt-bindings: spi: add PIC64GX SPI/QSPI compatibility to
MPFS SPI/QSPI bindings
1c4d834e4e81 spi: dt-bindings: convert spi-sc18is602.txt to yaml format

Now I am confused which prefix format shall I use? first spi or first
dt-bindings?


> should be this one:
>
> Please use subject prefixes matching the subsystem. You can get them for
> example with `git log --oneline -- DIRECTORY_OR_FILE` on the directory
> your patch is touching. For bindings, the preferred subjects are
> explained here:
> https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/devicetree/bindings/submitting-patches.html#i-for-patch-submitters
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>