On Tue, Aug 27, 2024 at 4:02 PM Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 27, 2024 at 4:55 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski > <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 26/08/2024 19:25, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > On Mon, Aug 26, 2024 at 06:18:50PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > > >> Drop kerneldoc descriptions of struct members which do not exist to fix > > >> W=1 warnings: > > >> > > >> drivers/gpio/gpio-pch.c:101: warning: Excess struct member 'lock' description in 'pch_gpio' > > >> drivers/gpio/gpio-syscon.c:46: warning: Excess struct member 'compatible' description in 'syscon_gpio_data' > > > > > > I prefer on per-driver basis, but since it's simple and I have nothing > > > in my queue, > > > > These are so trivial without impact on the code, even if W=1 reports > > them, that it would be quite a churn to handle multiple patches. > > Even trivial changes may lead to Git conflicts if managed separately. > But as I said, there is nothing in my queue (at all) so there are no > chances for conflicts. > Is this an Ack for me to take these or do you want them to go through your tree? Bart