On Thu, 2024-08-29 at 11:10 -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Thu, Aug 29, 2024 at 04:49:50PM +0200, Philipp Stanner wrote: > > On Thu, 2024-08-29 at 10:41 -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > On Thu, Aug 29, 2024 at 05:26:39PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > > On Thu, Aug 29, 2024 at 5:23 PM Michael S. Tsirkin > > > > <mst@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Aug 29, 2024 at 04:16:25PM +0200, Philipp Stanner > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > In psnet_open_pf_bar() and snet_open_vf_bar() a string > > > > > > later > > > > > > passed to > > > > > > pcim_iomap_regions() is placed on the stack. Neither > > > > > > pcim_iomap_regions() nor the functions it calls copy that > > > > > > string. > > > > > > > > > > > > Should the string later ever be used, this, consequently, > > > > > > causes > > > > > > undefined behavior since the stack frame will by then have > > > > > > disappeared. > > > > > > > > > > > > Fix the bug by allocating the strings on the heap through > > > > > > devm_kasprintf(). > > > > > > > > > > > > Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx # v6.3 > > > > > > Fixes: 51a8f9d7f587 ("virtio: vdpa: new SolidNET DPU > > > > > > driver.") > > > > > > Reported-by: Christophe JAILLET > > > > > > <christophe.jaillet@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > Closes: > > > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/74e9109a-ac59-49e2-9b1d-d825c9c9f891@xxxxxxxxxx/ > > > > > > Suggested-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Philipp Stanner <pstanner@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > > > > > Post this separately, so I can apply? > > > > > > > > Don't you use `b4`? With it it as simple as > > > > > > > > b4 am -P 6 $MSG_ID_OF_THIS_SERIES > > > > > > > > -- > > > > With Best Regards, > > > > Andy Shevchenko > > > > > > I can do all kind of things, but if it's posted as part of a > > > patchset, > > > it is not clear to me this has been tested outside of the > > > patchset. > > > > > > > Separating it from the series would lead to merge conflicts, > > because > > patch 7 depends on it. > > > > If you're responsible for vdpa in general I could send patches 6 > > and 7 > > separately to you. > > > > But number 7 depends on number 1, because pcim_iounmap_region() > > needs > > to be public. So if patches 1-5 enter through a different tree than > > yours, that could be a problem. > > > > > > P. > > Defer 1/7 until after the merge window, this is what is normally > done. 1 cannot be deferred. Take a look what 1 does. Your message is not comprehensible. Be so kind and write some more sentences. *What* is normally done? Sending patches? It's up to subsystem maintainers to queue them for the right cycle. > Adding new warnings is not nice, anyway. What? >