Re: [PATCH v4 0/7] riscv: sophgo: Add pinctrl support for CV1800 series SoC

[Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Sat, Aug 24, 2024 at 1:26 PM Inochi Amaoto <inochiama@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 23, 2024 at 05:44:17PM GMT, Linus Walleij wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 2, 2024 at 2:34 AM Inochi Amaoto <inochiama@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > > Add basic pinctrl driver for Sophgo CV1800 series SoCs.
> > > This patch series aims to replace the previous patch from Jisheng [1].
> > > Since the pinctrl of cv1800 has nested mux and its pin definination
> > > is discrete, it is not suitable to use "pinctrl-single" to cover the
> > > pinctrl device.
> > >
> > > This patch require another patch [2] that provides standard attribute
> > > "input-schmitt-microvolt"
> > >
> > > Note: As current documentation is not enough to guess the pin
> > > configuration of Huashan Pi, only the pinctrl node is added.
> > >
> > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/20231113005702.2467-1-jszhang@xxxxxxxxxx/
> > > [2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/IA1PR20MB495346246245074234D337A6BBAC2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
> > >
> > > Changed from v3:
> > > 1. binding: drop unnecessary type
> > > 2. binding: use right ref for pin node.
> > > 3. binding: remove mixed spaces and tabs.
> >
> > This v4 looks good to me and has necessary ACKs.
> >
> > It contains device tree patches which I am icky to merge but
> > I can merge the rest and give you an immutable branch in the
> > pinctrl tree that the ARM SoC maintainers can pull in to
> > merge the device trees, does this work for you?
> >
> > Yours,
> > Linus Walleij
>
> Hi, Linus
>
> It is OK for me, Thanks for taking it.

OK! The pinctrl base patches are merged to this immutable branch:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/linusw/linux-pinctrl.git/log/?h=ib-sophgo-pinctrl

The SoC tree can pull this in to get the binding files.

I have then merged this into the main pinctrl "devel" branch.

Yours,
Linus Walleij