Re: [PATCH 08/11] misc: rp1: RaspberryPi RP1 misc driver

[Andrea della Porta <andrea.porta@xxxxxxxx>]

Hi Krzysztof,

On 16:20 Wed 21 Aug     , Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 21/08/2024 10:38, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 20, 2024 at 04:36:10PM +0200, Andrea della Porta wrote:
> 
> ...
> 
> >>  drivers/misc/Kconfig                  |   1 +
> >>  drivers/misc/Makefile                 |   1 +
> >>  drivers/misc/rp1/Kconfig              |  20 ++
> >>  drivers/misc/rp1/Makefile             |   3 +
> >>  drivers/misc/rp1/rp1-pci.c            | 333 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>  drivers/misc/rp1/rp1-pci.dtso         |   8 +
> >>  drivers/pci/quirks.c                  |   1 +
> >>  include/linux/pci_ids.h               |   3 +
> >>  10 files changed, 524 insertions(+)
> >>  create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/rp1.dtso
> >>  create mode 100644 drivers/misc/rp1/Kconfig
> >>  create mode 100644 drivers/misc/rp1/Makefile
> >>  create mode 100644 drivers/misc/rp1/rp1-pci.c
> >>  create mode 100644 drivers/misc/rp1/rp1-pci.dtso
> >>
> >> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> >> index 67f460c36ea1..1359538b76e8 100644
> >> --- a/MAINTAINERS
> >> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> >> @@ -19119,9 +19119,11 @@ F:	include/uapi/linux/media/raspberrypi/
> >>  RASPBERRY PI RP1 PCI DRIVER
> >>  M:	Andrea della Porta <andrea.porta@xxxxxxxx>
> >>  S:	Maintained
> >> +F:	arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/rp1.dtso
> >>  F:	Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/raspberrypi,rp1-clocks.yaml
> >>  F:	Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/raspberrypi,rp1-gpio.yaml
> >>  F:	drivers/clk/clk-rp1.c
> >> +F:	drivers/misc/rp1/
> >>  F:	drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-rp1.c
> >>  F:	include/dt-bindings/clock/rp1.h
> >>  F:	include/dt-bindings/misc/rp1.h
> >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/rp1.dtso b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/rp1.dtso
> >> new file mode 100644
> >> index 000000000000..d80178a278ee
> >> --- /dev/null
> >> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/rp1.dtso
> >> @@ -0,0 +1,152 @@
> >> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR MIT)
> >> +
> >> +#include <dt-bindings/gpio/gpio.h>
> >> +#include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/irq.h>
> >> +#include <dt-bindings/clock/rp1.h>
> >> +#include <dt-bindings/misc/rp1.h>
> >> +
> >> +/dts-v1/;
> >> +/plugin/;
> >> +
> >> +/ {
> >> +	fragment@0 {
> >> +		target-path="";
> >> +		__overlay__ {
> >> +			#address-cells = <3>;
> >> +			#size-cells = <2>;
> >> +
> >> +			rp1: rp1@0 {
> >> +				compatible = "simple-bus";
> >> +				#address-cells = <2>;
> >> +				#size-cells = <2>;
> >> +				interrupt-controller;
> >> +				interrupt-parent = <&rp1>;
> >> +				#interrupt-cells = <2>;
> >> +
> >> +				// ranges and dma-ranges must be provided by the includer
> >> +				ranges = <0xc0 0x40000000
> >> +					  0x01/*0x02000000*/ 0x00 0x00000000
> >> +					  0x00 0x00400000>;
> > 
> > Are you 100% sure you do not have here dtc W=1 warnings?
> 
> One more thing, I do not see this overlay applied to any target, which
> means it cannot be tested. You miss entry in Makefile.
>

The dtso is intended to be built from driver/misc/rp1/Makefile as it will
be included in the driver obj:

--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/misc/rp1/Makefile
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
+rp1-pci-objs                   := rp1-pci.o rp1-pci.dtbo.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_MISC_RP1)         += rp1-pci.o

and not as part of the dtb system, hence it's m issing in
arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/Makefile.

On the other hand:

#> make W=1 CHECK_DTBS=y broadcom/rp1.dtbo
  DTC     arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/rp1.dtbo
arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/rp1.dtso:37.24-42.7: Warning (simple_bus_reg): /fragment@0/__overlay__/rp1@0/clk_xosc: missing or empty reg/ranges property
arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/rp1.dtso:44.26-49.7: Warning (simple_bus_reg): /fragment@0/__overlay__/rp1@0/macb_pclk: missing or empty reg/ranges property
arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/rp1.dtso:51.26-56.7: Warning (simple_bus_reg): /fragment@0/__overlay__/rp1@0/macb_hclk: missing or empty reg/ranges property
arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/rp1.dtso:14.15-173.5: Warning (avoid_unnecessary_addr_size): /fragment@0/__overlay__: unnecessary #address-cells/#size-cells without "ranges", "dma-ranges" or child "reg" property

seems to do the checks, unless I'm missing something.

Thanks,
Andrea

> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>