Re: [RFC v7 3/6] irqchip: add mpfs gpio interrupt mux

[Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Fri, Aug 02 2024 at 09:08, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 01, 2024 at 08:49:08PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 01 2024 at 16:09, Conor Dooley wrote:
>> > On Mon, Jul 29, 2024 at 12:41:25PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> >> > +	/*
>> >> > +	 * If a bit is set in the mux, GPIO the corresponding interrupt from
>> >> > +	 * controller 2 is direct and that controllers 0 or 1 is muxed.
>> >> 
>> >> This is not a coherent sentence.
>> >
>> > It should read "controller 0 or 1;s interrupt is muxed". Does that make
>
> Heh, I even typoed here, the ; should be a '.
>
>> > more sense to you?
>> 
>> No: If a bit is set in the mux, GPIO the corresponding...
>> 
>> I'm already failing at 'GPIO'. My parser expects a verb there :)
>
> Ah, so double mistake in the sentence. s/GPIO// I suppose. An updated
> comment could be:
>
> "If a bit is set in the mux, the corresponding interrupt from GPIO
> controller 2 is direct and controller 0 or 1's interrupt is muxed"

That's actually understandable for mere mortals :)