Hi! On 2015-12-09 09:01, Ludovic Desroches wrote: > Hi Peter, > > On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 04:20:06AM +0100, Peter Rosin wrote: >> From: Peter Rosin <peda@xxxxxxxxxx> >> >> Hi! >> >> I have a signal connected to a gpio pin which is the output of >> a comparator. By changing the level of one of the inputs to the >> comparator, I can detect the envelope of the other input to >> the comparator by using a series of measurements much in the >> same maner a manual ADC works, but watching for changes on the >> comparator over a period of time instead of only the immediate >> output. >> >> Now, the input signal to the comparator might have a high frequency, >> which will cause the output from the comparator (and thus the GPIO >> input) to change rapidly. >> >> A common(?) idiom for this is to use the interrupt status register >> to catch the glitches, but then not have any interrupt tied to >> the pin as that could possibly generate pointless bursts of >> (expensive) interrupts. >> > > Well I don't know if this use case as already been considered. I > understand you don't want to be overwhelmed by interrupts but why not > using the interrupt to start polling the PDSR (Pin Data Status > Register)? That scheme will not work for me. There might be only one short glitch, and there might be a flood. I need to catch both. What could be made to work is some kind of one-off interrupt thingy. I.e. an interrupt that disabled itself when hit (if that is possibly without lockup?). That could be a small generic driver not specific to gpio, I suppose, but where should such a beast live and what user space interface should it have? And while that is generic and will probably work in more cases, it seems complicated and quite a bit of a detour compared to simply reading the same info from a register. Are there really noone else using ISR type registers like this with Linux? In my mind that was pretty standard practice... > I am really not comfortable about exposing the ISR since there is a > clean on read. You have taken precautions by checking the IMR before but > if there is a single driver using a gpio as an irq, you will never get > the ISR. Yes, I'm aware of the limitation, but in my case that's not a problem, obviously. I have no (other) interrupt sources on the gpios covered by the ISR register in question. I take it that your major concern is the non-generality, i.e. that it is not possible to safely get at the ISR when there are interrupts enabled, and not the complication/overhead of the new lock? Cheers, Peter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html