On 12/04/2015 05:35 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote: > * Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@xxxxxx> [151204 02:45]: >> On 12/03/2015 11:37 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote: >>> * Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@xxxxxx> [151203 10:36]: >>>> >>>> I think, this patch should not break our wake-up functionality. >>>> It will just change the moment when pcs_irq_handler() will be called: >>>> >>>> before this change: >>>> - suspend_enter() >>>> .... >>>> - arch_suspend_enable_irqs(); >>>> - ^ right here >>>> >>>> after this change: >>>> - suspend_enter() >>>> .... >>>> dpm_resume_noirq() >>>> - resume_device_irqs() >>>> ^ here >>>> >>>> Correct? And as for me this is more safe. >>> >>> I think there's more to it though. With both applied, it produces this on >>> coming back up from suspend: >>> >>> PM: noirq resume of devices complete after 18.127 msecs >>> ------------[ cut here ]------------ >>> WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 123 at kernel/irq/manage.c:605 irq_set_irq_wake+0xbc/0xfc() >>> Unbalanced IRQ 375 wake disable >>> Modules linked in: ledtrig_default_on leds_gpio led_class rtc_twl twl4030_wdt >>> CPU: 0 PID: 123 Comm: bash Tainted: G W 4.4.0-rc3-dirty #2682 >>> Hardware name: Generic OMAP36xx (Flattened Device Tree) >>> [<c0017df0>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c0014084>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14) >>> <c0014084>] (show_stack) from [<c03492d0>] (dump_stack+0x84/0x9c) >>> [<c03492d0>] (dump_stack) from [<c003ca2c>] (warn_slowpath_common+0x7c/0xb8) >>> [<c003ca2c>] (warn_slowpath_common) from [<c003ca98>] (warn_slowpath_fmt+0x30/0x40) >>> [<c003ca98>] (warn_slowpath_fmt) from [<c009b66c>] (irq_set_irq_wake+0xbc/0xfc) >>> [<c009b66c>] (irq_set_irq_wake) from [<c03f0f1c>] (device_wakeup_disarm_wake_irqs+0x70/0x12c) >>> [<c03f0f1c>] (device_wakeup_disarm_wake_irqs) from [<c03ee4ac>] (dpm_resume_noirq+0x20c/0x2e4) >>> [<c03ee4ac>] (dpm_resume_noirq) from [<c0095e94>] (suspend_devices_and_enter+0x1e4/0x6bc) >>> [<c0095e94>] (suspend_devices_and_enter) from [<c00966c4>] (pm_suspend+0x358/0x4b8) >>> [<c00966c4>] (pm_suspend) from [<c0094fdc>] (state_store+0x64/0xb8) >>> [<c0094fdc>] (state_store) from [<c034b46c>] (kobj_attr_store+0x14/0x20) >>> [<c034b46c>] (kobj_attr_store) from [<c01ea4d8>] (sysfs_kf_write+0x4c/0x50) >>> [<c01ea4d8>] (sysfs_kf_write) from [<c01e9afc>] (kernfs_fop_write+0xbc/0x1cc) >>> [<c01e9afc>] (kernfs_fop_write) from [<c0171c7c>] (__vfs_write+0x24/0xd8) >>> [<c0171c7c>] (__vfs_write) from [<c0172520>] (vfs_write+0x94/0x154) >>> [<c0172520>] (vfs_write) from [<c0172d1c>] (SyS_write+0x40/0x94) >>> [<c0172d1c>] (SyS_write) from [<c000f760>] (ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x1c) >>> ---[ end trace 321b51565e161bee ]--- >>> >>> And these both need to be applied together when we have a fix for the above >>> as otherwise we'll get the lock recursion Sudeep mentioned in patch 2/2. >>> >> >> Most probably below diff will fix above issue: >> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm_common.c >> b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm_common.c >> index 3fc2cbe..69cde67 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm_common.c >> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm_common.c >> @@ -338,6 +338,7 @@ int omap_prcm_register_chain_handler(struct >> omap_prcm_irq_setup *irq_setup) >> ct->chip.irq_ack = irq_gc_ack_set_bit; >> ct->chip.irq_mask = irq_gc_mask_clr_bit; >> ct->chip.irq_unmask = irq_gc_mask_set_bit; >> + ct->chip.flags = IRQCHIP_SKIP_SET_WAKE; >> >> ct->regs.ack = irq_setup->ack + i * 4; >> ct->regs.mask = irq_setup->mask + i * 4; >> >> > > That fixes the warning on resume, but adds a new one during init: > > ------------[ cut here ]------------ > WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1 at kernel/irq/pm.c:51 irq_pm_install_action+0x9c/0xec() > Modules linked in: > CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 4.4.0-rc3-00001-g6a5e5ec #2694 > Hardware name: Generic OMAP36xx (Flattened Device Tree) > [<c0017df0>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c0014084>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14) > [<c0014084>] (show_stack) from [<c03492f0>] (dump_stack+0x84/0x9c) > [<c03492f0>] (dump_stack) from [<c003ca34>] (warn_slowpath_common+0x7c/0xb8) > [<c003ca34>] (warn_slowpath_common) from [<c003cb0c>] (warn_slowpath_null+0x1c/0x24) > [<c003cb0c>] (warn_slowpath_null) from [<c00a27d8>] (irq_pm_install_action+0x9c/0xec) > [<c00a27d8>] (irq_pm_install_action) from [<c009ccb0>] (__setup_irq+0x434/0x5e0) > [<c009ccb0>] (__setup_irq) from [<c009cfb0>] (request_threaded_irq+0xc4/0x15c) > [<c009cfb0>] (request_threaded_irq) from [<c08c25e8>] (omap3_pm_init+0x10c/0x400) > [<c08c25e8>] (omap3_pm_init) from [<c08bc66c>] (omap3_init_late+0xc/0x14) > [<c08bc66c>] (omap3_init_late) from [<c08b5820>] (init_machine_late+0x1c/0x90) > [<c08b5820>] (init_machine_late) from [<c0009804>] (do_one_initcall+0x80/0x1e0) > [<c0009804>] (do_one_initcall) from [<c08b2ec4>] (kernel_init_freeable+0x218/0x2e8) > [<c08b2ec4>] (kernel_init_freeable) from [<c064584c>] (kernel_init+0x8/0xec) > [<c064584c>] (kernel_init) from [<c000f7f0>] (ret_from_fork+0x14/0x24) > ---[ end trace 81093452bf564522 ]--- > Sorry, I can't test it right now :( Potential fix below: diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c index 2dbd378..4e56fd9 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c @@ -481,7 +481,7 @@ int __init omap3_pm_init(void) /* IO interrupt is shared with mux code */ ret = request_irq(omap_prcm_event_to_irq("io"), - _prcm_int_handle_io, IRQF_SHARED | IRQF_NO_SUSPEND, "pm_io", + _prcm_int_handle_io, IRQF_SHARED, "pm_io", omap3_pm_init); enable_irq(omap_prcm_event_to_irq("io")); @@ -489,6 +489,7 @@ int __init omap3_pm_init(void) pr_err("pm: Failed to request pm_io irq\n"); goto err2; } + enable_irq_wake(omap_prcm_event_to_irq("io")); ret = pwrdm_for_each(pwrdms_setup, NULL); if (ret) { -- regards, -grygorii -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html