On Wed, 2024-06-19 at 19:24 +0800, Potin Lai wrote: > On Mon, Jun 17, 2024 at 3:33 PM Andrew Jeffery > <andrew@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Thu, 2024-06-13 at 16:07 +0800, Potin Lai wrote: > > > In the NCSI pin table, the reference clock output pin (RMIIXRCLKO) is not > > > needed on the management controller side. > > > > > > To optimize pin usage, add new NCSI pin groupis that excludes RMIIXRCLKO, > > > reducing the number of required pins. > > > > Hmm, I'm not convinced this is specific to NCSI (and it's an > > unfortunate mistake on my part), but we do need to call the groups > > something different than RMII[34]. Did you have any other suggestions? > > > I don't have better name for now. > In ast2600 data sheet, it also mentioned "RMII" & "NCSI" together most > of the time, is it ok to use "NCSI" as a new group name? Perhaps we go with "NCSI", because the other thoughts I had are all much less succinct. Can you please add a note to the description in the binding that discusses the difference between the RMII and NCSI groups? Andrew