Re: [PATCH v10 00/38] ep93xx device tree conversion

[Nikita Shubin <nikita.shubin@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hello Andy!
On Mon, 2024-06-17 at 12:58 +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 17, 2024 at 11:38 AM Nikita Shubin via B4 Relay
> <devnull+nikita.shubin.maquefel.me@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > 
> > The goal is to recieve ACKs for all patches in series to merge it
> > via Arnd branch.
> 
> 'receive'
> 
> > Unfortunately, CLK subsystem suddenly went silent on clk portion of
> > series V2 reroll,
> > tried to ping them for about a month but no luck.
> > 
> > Link:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240408-ep93xx-clk-v2-1-adcd68c13753@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > 
> > Some changes since last version (v9) - see "Changes in v10", mostly
> > cosmetic.
> 
> ...
> 
> > Patches should be formated with '--histogram'
> 
> 'formatted'
> 
> ...
> 
> > Changes in v10:
> > 
> > Reordered SoB tags to make sure they appear before Rb and Acked
> > tags.
> 
> This is not required. The importance is only the order of SoBs
> themselves. If they are interleaved with other tags, it's fine.

Ah - ok. Just saw someone was complaining about b4 reordering them. 

> 
> ...
> 
> 
> Hopefully to see this series being eventually applied soon.
> Arnd? (Do we have all necessary subsystem maintainers' tags, btw?)
> 
> 

As i see from my perspective only three left:

Clk subsystem:

- clk: ep93xx: add DT support for Cirrus EP93xx

DMA subsystem (but the only request from Vinod, as far as i remember,
was fixing commits titles):

- dmaengine: cirrus: Convert to DT for Cirrus EP93xx
- dmaengine: cirrus: remove platform code

Beside that tags missing on platform code removal (which can be Acked
by Arnd himself i believe) and dtsi/dts files (same ?).