RE: [PATCH 0/3] pinctrl: scmi: support i.MX95 OEM extensions with fsl,pins property

[Peng Fan <peng.fan@xxxxxxx>]

Hi Sudeep,

> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] pinctrl: scmi: support i.MX95 OEM extensions with
> fsl,pins property
> 
> On Mon, May 27, 2024 at 08:36:27AM +0000, Peng Fan wrote:
> > Hi Linus, Sudeep, Cristian,
> >
> > > Subject: [PATCH 0/3] pinctrl: scmi: support i.MX95 OEM extensions
> > > with fsl,pins property
> >
> > Sorry if this is an early ping to you. Just wanna this not blocking
> > i.MX95 upstream support.
> >
> 
> I would say yes as this was posted bang in the middle of the merge window.
> So it is possible for people to miss this if they are busy otherwise.
> 
> I wouldn't have responded in general or if someone is new to the Linux kernel
> development. But you are no new to kernel development.
> 
> In general I also have a suggestion for you. Avoid churning the dependent
> patch series if the base set of patches are not yet reviewed or agreed upon.
> I was super confused with the amount of different concurrent but dependent
> patch series you had for this whole i.MX SCMI pinmux support. I had ignored
> and not responded in the past but thought it would be good to respond in
> this thread.

Thanks for your suggestion.  I tried to do different implementations that
could make all of us agree, so it was indeed many versions with different
implementations. Sorry. I will improve.

BTW: would you please also give an ACK for patch 3, because patch 3 uses
module_scmi_driver?

Thanks,
Peng.

> 
> --
> Regards,
> Sudeep