Hi, Am Freitag, 31. Mai 2024, 15:30:58 CEST schrieb Andy Shevchenko: > On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 01:19:56PM +0200, Alexander Stein wrote: > > Am Donnerstag, 30. Mai 2024, 21:12:30 CEST schrieb Andy Shevchenko: > > > Show more info for interrupt only lines in debugfs. It's useful > > > to monitor the lines that have been never requested as GPIOs, > > > but IRQs. > > > > I was trying to test this on TQMa8MPQL (i.MX8MP) using gpio-mxc.c. > > Thank you for trying! > > > But apparently this series only has an effect when gpiochip_lock_as_irq() > > is called eventually. I'm wondering what needs to be done so IRQ only > > GPIOs are listed in debugfs. Using irq_request_resources/irq_release_resources > > similar to what pinctrl-at91.c is doing? > > I haven't looked deeply into this and I don't know if it's relevant, but... > > The idea is that GPIO driver has an IRQ chip that announces handle_bad_irq() > as a handler and IRQ_TYPE_NONE as default type at probe stage. It also needs > to implement ->set_irq_type() callback where actual handler is going to be > locked. > > That's what I do not see implemented in the driver. Moreover, I do see it > implements its own ->to_irq() callback which shouldn't be there. > > Taking all above into consideration _I think_ the drivers need a bit of > refreshments. I noticed this driver is using irq_chip_generic and a dedicated irq domain. I'm not sure if this is superseded meanwhile using the integrated IRQ chip inside that GPIO chip. Thanks for looking into this. Best regards, Alexander -- TQ-Systems GmbH | Mühlstraße 2, Gut Delling | 82229 Seefeld, Germany Amtsgericht München, HRB 105018 Geschäftsführer: Detlef Schneider, Rüdiger Stahl, Stefan Schneider http://www.tq-group.com/