Re: [PATCH 8/8] gpio: tqmx86: fix broken IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH interrupt type

[Matthias Schiffer <matthias.schiffer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, 2024-05-30 at 13:22 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> 
> On Thu, May 30, 2024 at 10:39:25AM +0200, Matthias Schiffer wrote:
> > On Wed, 2024-05-29 at 17:38 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > > 
> > > On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 09:45:20AM +0200, Matthias Schiffer wrote:
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-tqmx86.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-tqmx86.c
> > > > index c957be3341774..400415676ad5d 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-tqmx86.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-tqmx86.c
> > > > @@ -126,9 +126,15 @@ static void _tqmx86_gpio_irq_config(struct tqmx86_gpio_data *gpio, int hwirq)
> > > >  	unsigned int offset = hwirq - TQMX86_NGPO;
> > > >  	u8 type = TQMX86_INT_TRIG_NONE, mask, val;
> > > >  
> > > > -	if (gpio->irq_type[hwirq] & TQMX86_INT_UNMASKED)
> > > > +	if (gpio->irq_type[hwirq] & TQMX86_INT_UNMASKED) {
> > > >  		type = gpio->irq_type[hwirq] & TQMX86_INT_TRIG_MASK;
> > > >  
> > > > +		if (type == TQMX86_INT_TRIG_BOTH)
> > > > +			type = tqmx86_gpio_get(&gpio->chip, hwirq)
> > >                                                             ^^^^^
> > > 
> > > > +				? TQMX86_INT_TRIG_FALLING
> > > > +				: TQMX86_INT_TRIG_RISING;
> > > > +	}
> > > > +
> > > >  	mask = TQMX86_GPII_MASK(offset);
> > >                                 ^^^^^^
> > > >  	val = TQMX86_GPII_CONFIG(offset, type);
> > >                                  ^^^^^^
> > > >  	_tqmx86_gpio_update_bits(gpio, TQMX86_GPIIC, mask, val);
> > > 
> > > The offset stuff wasn't beautiful and I'm glad you are deleting it.  My
> > > understanding is that a hwirq is 0-3 for output or 4-7 input.  An offset
> > > is "hwirq % 4"?
> > > 
> > > There are a bunch of places which are still marked as taking an offset
> > > but they all actually take a hwirq.  For example, tqmx86_gpio_get()
> > > above.  The only things which still actually take an offset are the
> > > TQMX86_GPII_MASK() and TQMX86_GPII_CONFIG() macros.
> > > 
> > > Could you:
> > > 1) Modify TQMX86_GPII_MASK() and TQMX86_GPII_CONFIG() to take a hwirq?
> > > 2) Rename all the "offset" variables to "hwirq"?
> > 
> > Unfortunately, the TQMx86 GPIO is a huge mess, and the mapping between GPIO numbers and IRQ numbers
> > depends on the hardware generation/variant. I don't think it is possible to have GPIO numbers and
> > hwirq numbers differ, is it?
> > 
> > Currently, the driver only supports COM Express modules, where IRQs 0-3 correspond to GPIOs 4-7,
> > while GPIOs 0-3 don't have interrupt support.
> 
> I'm so confused.
> 
> So "offset" is the GPIO number and "hwirq" is the IRQ number?  If the
> IRQ numbers are 0-3 then why do we subtract 4 to get the GPIO number in

The current naming in the driver is confusing and I'll fix that in the next round of refactoring
patches.

Generally, hwirq == GPIO number (I have not found a way to change this mapping - if there is one,
I'd be interested to try if it makes the code less confusing). "offset" currently always refers to
some shift in a hardware register. In tqmx86_gpio_get and tqmx86_gpio_set, offset is a GPIO number.
In all functions dealing with IRQs, offset is an IRQ number (which is different from the hwirq
number).

Matthias


> _tqmx86_gpio_irq_config()?
> 
> 	unsigned int offset = hwirq - TQMX86_NGPO;
> 
> And again, it's just weird to call:
> 
> 		type = tqmx86_gpio_get(&gpio->chip, hwirq);
> 
> where we're passing "hwirq" when tqmx86_gpio_get() takes an "offset" as
> an argument.
> 
> regards,
> dan carpenter
> 

-- 
TQ-Systems GmbH | Mühlstraße 2, Gut Delling | 82229 Seefeld, Germany
Amtsgericht München, HRB 105018
Geschäftsführer: Detlef Schneider, Rüdiger Stahl, Stefan Schneider
https://www.tq-group.com/