Hi Linus, On 17.11.2015 13:50, Markus Pargmann wrote: > Hi Vladimir, > > On Tuesday 17 November 2015 13:20:40 Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote: >> Hi Markus, >> >> On 17.11.2015 11:24, Markus Pargmann wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> On Wednesday 11 November 2015 14:36:53 Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote: >>>> Commit c0017ed71966 ("gpio: Introduce gpio descriptor 'name'") causes >>>> OOPS on boot on LPC32xx boards: >>>> >>>> Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000000 >>>> CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper Not tainted 4.3.0+ #707 >>>> Hardware name: LPC32XX SoC (Flattened Device Tree) >>>> task: c381baa0 ti: c381e000 task.ti: c381e000 >>>> PC is at strcmp+0x10/0x40 >>>> LR is at gpiochip_add+0x3d0/0x4d4 >>>> pc : [<>] lr : [<>] psr: a0000093 >>>> sp : c381fd60 ip : c381fd70 fp : c381fd6c >>>> >>>> [snip] >>>> >>>> Backtrace: >>>> [<>] (strcmp) from [<>] (gpiochip_add+0x3d0/0x4d4) >>>> [<>] (gpiochip_add) from [<>] (lpc32xx_gpio_probe+0x44/0x60) >>>> [<>] (lpc32xx_gpio_probe) from [<>] (platform_drv_probe+0x40/0x8c) >>>> [<>] (platform_drv_probe) from [<>] (driver_probe_device+0x110/0x294) >>>> [<>] (driver_probe_device) from [<>] (__driver_attach+0x70/0x94) >>>> [<>] (__driver_attach) from [<>] (bus_for_each_dev+0x74/0x98) >>>> [<>] (bus_for_each_dev) from [<>] (driver_attach+0x20/0x28) >>>> [<>] (driver_attach) from [<>] (bus_add_driver+0xd4/0x1f0) >>>> [<>] (bus_add_driver) from [<>] (driver_register+0xa4/0xe8) >>>> [<>] (driver_register) from [<>] (__platform_driver_register+0x38/0x4c) >>>> [<>] (__platform_driver_register) from [<>] (lpc32xx_gpio_driver_init+0x18/0x20) >>>> [<>] (lpc32xx_gpio_driver_init) from [<>] (do_one_initcall+0x108/0x1c8) >>>> [<>] (do_one_initcall) from [<>] (kernel_init_freeable+0x10c/0x1d4) >>>> [<>] (kernel_init_freeable) from [<>] (kernel_init+0x10/0xec) >>>> [<>] (kernel_init) from [<>] (ret_from_fork+0x14/0x24) >>>> >>>> This is caused by the fact that at the moment some GPIO names are set >>>> to NULL, there is a hole in linear representation of one GPI bank, see >>>> drivers/gpio/gpio-lpc32xx.c / gpi_p3_names[] for details. >>>> >>>> The same problem most probably affects also gpio-cs5535.c, see >>>> cs5535_gpio_names[]. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vz@xxxxxxxxx> >>>> --- >>>> Linus, Markus, >>>> >>>> I understand that LPC32xx GPIO driver is ugly (hopefully this >>>> will be changed in future), but please account this problem. >>>> >>>> I don't ask for inclusion of this change, because my own analysis is >>>> not done completely. >>>> >>>> Also please review, the same problem probably affects gpio-cs5535.c >>>> as well, see cs5535_gpio_names[]. >>> >>> Thanks for this hint. But I think these patches for gpio_name_to_desc won't get >>> mainline any time soon as this depends on the chardev interface and how it will >>> look like. >>> >> >> sorry for misunderstanding, what do mean by "these patches"? >> >> I see two options here, one is to fix or revert your c0017ed71966 due to >> caused regressions, another one is to update affected GPIO drivers >> removing discontinuity in GPIO enumeration inside a bank. > > Sorry, seems I was on a wrong kernel version when checking this morning. Linus > removed lots of my patches from his tree after some correct comments so I > thought this patch was removed as well. Linus, should I resend this fix for v4.4 or is it good enough for application? > As it is mainline your patch looks good to me. Perhaps a comment on why we need > to check for !name at this point would be good. There is such a description in the commit message, why this check is needed. With best wishes, Vladimir > Best Regards, > > Markus > >> >> With best wishes, >> Vladimir >> >>>> >>>> drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c | 2 +- >>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c >>>> index a18f00f..2a91f32 100644 >>>> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c >>>> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c >>>> @@ -233,7 +233,7 @@ static struct gpio_desc *gpio_name_to_desc(const char * const name) >>>> for (i = 0; i != chip->ngpio; ++i) { >>>> struct gpio_desc *gpio = &chip->desc[i]; >>>> >>>> - if (!gpio->name) >>>> + if (!gpio->name || !name) >>>> continue; >>>> >>>> if (!strcmp(gpio->name, name)) { >>>> >>> >> > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html