On 11/26/2015 at 8:20 AM, John Crispin wrote: > > > On 26/11/2015 08:15, Martin Schiller wrote: > > On 11/26/2015 at 8:04 AM, John Crispin wrote: > >> > >> > >> On 26/11/2015 07:40, Martin Schiller wrote: > >>> On 11/25/2015 at 11:40 AM, Jonas Gorski wrote: > >>>> Hi > >>>> > >>>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 11:18 AM, Martin Schiller > <mschiller@xxxxxx> > >>>> wrote: > >>>>> From: John Crispin <blogic@xxxxxxxxxxx> > >>>>> > >>>>> This patch is included in the openwrt patchset for several years > >> now > >>>> and needs > >>>>> to go upstream as well. It includes the following changes: > >>>>> 1. Fix up inline function call to xway_mux_apply > >>>> > >>>> This really needs an explanation what is being fixed here. > >>> > >>> I hope John - as the original author of this patch - can explain > >>> why this change is necessary. > >> > >> what change? why am I in Cc: and not To: if an action is required ? > >> > >> John > > > > That change is meant: > > > ####################################################################### > # > >> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-xway.c > b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl- > >> xway.c > >> index a064962..f0b1b48 100644 > >> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-xway.c > >> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-xway.c > >> @@ -1496,10 +1496,9 @@ static struct pinctrl_desc xway_pctrl_desc = > { > >> .confops= &xway_pinconf_ops, > >> }; > >> > >> -static inline int xway_mux_apply(struct pinctrl_dev *pctrldev, > >> +static int mux_apply(struct ltq_pinmux_info *info, > >> int pin, int mux) > >> { > >> -struct ltq_pinmux_info *info = pinctrl_dev_get_drvdata(pctrldev); > >> int port = PORT(pin); > >> u32 alt1_reg = GPIO_ALT1(pin); > >> > >> @@ -1519,6 +1518,14 @@ static inline int xway_mux_apply(struct > >> pinctrl_dev *pctrldev, > >> return 0; > >> } > >> > >> +static inline int xway_mux_apply(struct pinctrl_dev *pctrldev, > >> +int pin, int mux) > >> +{ > >> +struct ltq_pinmux_info *info = pinctrl_dev_get_drvdata(pctrldev); > >> + > >> +return mux_apply(info, pin, mux); > >> +} > >> + > >> static const struct ltq_cfg_param xway_cfg_params[] = { > >> {"lantiq,pull",LTQ_PINCONF_PARAM_PULL}, > >> {"lantiq,open-drain",LTQ_PINCONF_PARAM_OPEN_DRAIN}, > > > ####################################################################### > > > > ok so you picked up a patch and sent it upstream without looking at > what > it really does. the patch is simply not ready for upstream. the problem > here is copy & paste inconsistency. Of course I analyzed the whole patch and - as you may have noticed - added a description for the 3 changes which were made in this patch. I also know that this first part of the patch changes the scope of the inline code, but I did not know why this change was done. > > however if we want to resolve this we should either keep the inlines > and > just stick to the current code pattern used or we could just assume > that > the compiler will be smart enough to to know when to inline and remove > all of them. > > i'll leave it up to you to decide and propose your solution as a patch > with an explanation. > > John So I think it would be the best for now to leave this code as it is and make two separate patches from the remaining two changes: - Fix GPIO Setup of GPIO Port3 - Implement gpio_chip.to_irq Martin > > > >> > >>> > >>>> > >>>>> 2. Fix GPIO Setup of GPIO Port3 > >>>> > >>>> This change looks fine. > >>>> > >>>>> 3. Implement gpio_chip.to_irq > >>>> > >>>> These are three different changes (two fixes, one new feature) and > >>>> therefore should be split up into three patches. > >>> > >>> As I'm not the author of this patch, I decided to leave it as it > is. > >>> But per se you are right, it would be better to split it up. > >>> > >>>> > >>>>> Signed-off-by: John Crispin <blogic@xxxxxxxxxxx> > >>>>> Signed-off-by: Martin Schiller <mschiller@xxxxxx> > >>>>> --- > >>>> > >>>> Also please provide a changelog for your patches here. > >>> > >>> OK. > >>> > >>>> > >>>>> drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-xway.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- > >>>>> 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> Jonas > >>> > >>> Martin > >>> > >>> > > > > ��.n��������+%������w��{.n�����{�� b���ܨ}���Ơz�j:+v�����w����ޙ��&�)ߡ�a����z�ޗ���ݢj��w�f