On Tue 17 Nov 17:00 PST 2015, Stephen Boyd wrote: > The drivers don't really need to know which PMIC they're for, so > make a generic binding for them. This alleviates us from updating > the drivers every time a new PMIC comes out. It's still > recommended that we update the binding with new PMIC models and > always specify the specific model for the MPPs and gpios before > the generic compatible string in devicetree, but this at least > cuts down on adding more and more compatible strings to the > drivers until we actually need them. > > Cc: <devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: "Ivan T. Ivanov" <iivanov@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > I must say that when it comes to writing dts files I much prefer the msm way of denoting functions over the pmic one. But because of that decision this makes perfect sense! Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Regards, Bjorn -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html