On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 04:16:16PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 2:21 AM, Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 12:55 AM, LABBE Corentin > > <clabbe.montjoie@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> of_match_device could return NULL, and so cause a NULL pointer > >> dereference later at line 132: > >> priv->flags = (uintptr_t) of_id->data; > >> > >> Reported-by: coverity (CID 1324141) > >> Signed-off-by: LABBE Corentin <clabbe.montjoie@xxxxxxxxx> > >> --- > >> drivers/gpio/gpio-74xx-mmio.c | 3 +++ > >> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > >> > >> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-74xx-mmio.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-74xx-mmio.c > >> index 6ed7c0f..4a7be0f 100644 > >> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-74xx-mmio.c > >> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-74xx-mmio.c > >> @@ -120,6 +120,9 @@ static int mmio_74xx_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > >> void __iomem *dat; > >> int err; > >> > >> + if (!of_id) > >> + return -ENODEV; > >> + > > > > Nit: in that case, could you also move the assignment of of_id to its > > own line right above these added lines? It would keep things in the > > same place > > I think it's more that just a nit. +1 to move assignment. Hello I agree, I will send an updated patch soon. Regards LABBE Corentin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html