Re: [PATCH 1/4] Documentation: tps65086: Add DT bindings for the TPS65086 PMIC

[Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, 21 Oct 2015, Mark Brown wrote:

> On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 09:46:33AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Tue, 20 Oct 2015, Andrew F. Davis wrote:
> 
> > > I could change the core to be "tps65086-pmic", then call the regulator
> > > driver "tps65086-regulator" if this works for you, this seems to be the
> > > way new drivers name the regulator driver (max77843.c).
> 
> > Yes, this is what I was thinking of.
> 
> > ti,tps65086 is uninformative/undescriptive and tells me nothing.
> 
> It is however the normal way we write compatible strings - the class
> information would normaly go in the node name (ie, i2c@7000c000 or
> whatever).

I didn't say it hasn't been done before, just that I didn't like it
for the aforementioned reasons.  I can also find 1000's of compatible
strings which do append "-<device_type>", so it's not exactly an
unheard of practice.

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html