Re: [REPOST PATCH v2] drivers/pinctrl: Add the concept of an "init" state

[Doug Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi,

On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 7:46 PM, kbuild test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Doug,
>
> [auto build test ERROR on pinctrl/for-next -- if it's inappropriate base, please suggest rules for selecting the more suitable base]
>
> url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Douglas-Anderson/drivers-pinctrl-Add-the-concept-of-an-init-state/20151021-101131
> config: i386-randconfig-x004-10191220 (attached as .config)
> reproduce:
>         # save the attached .config to linux build tree
>         make ARCH=i386
>
> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
>
>    drivers/base/dd.c: In function 'really_probe':
>>> drivers/base/dd.c:325:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'pinctrl_init_done' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>      pinctrl_init_done(dev);
>      ^
>    cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
>
> vim +/pinctrl_init_done +325 drivers/base/dd.c
>
>    319          } else if (drv->probe) {
>    320                  ret = drv->probe(dev);
>    321                  if (ret)
>    322                          goto probe_failed;
>    323          }
>    324
>  > 325          pinctrl_init_done(dev);
>    326
>    327          if (dev->pm_domain && dev->pm_domain->sync)
>    328                  dev->pm_domain->sync(dev);

Yup, good catch Mr. Robot.  I think I've got it all fixed up in:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/7454311/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html