On 16/10/15 17:17, Stephen Warren wrote: > On 10/16/2015 03:24 AM, Jon Hunter wrote: >> The description of the XUSB_PADCTL_USB3_PAD_MUX_0 register in the >> Tegra124 >> documentation implies that all functions (pcie, usb3 and sata) can be >> muxed onto to all lanes (pcie lanes 0-4 and sata lane 0). However, it has >> been confirmed that this is not the case and the mux'ing options much >> more >> limited. Unfortunately, the public documentation has not been updated to >> reflect this and so detail the actual mux'ing options here by function: > > FWIW, there's better documentation of this in the Tegra210 TRM, although > the options have been expanded on that chip, so the docs don't entirely > apply to Tegra124. > >> Function: Lanes: >> pcie1 x2: pcie3, pcie4 >> pcie1 x4: pcie1, pcie2, pcie3, pcie4 >> pcie2 x1 (option1): pcie0 >> pcie2 x1 (option2): pcie2 >> usb3 port 0: pcie0 >> usb3 port 1 (option 1): pcie1 >> usb3 port 1 (option 2): sata0 >> sata: sata0 > > I think this change needs a DT binding change to go along with it. Can > you take a look at: > > http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg449647.html > [PATCH 1/2] dt: update Tegra XUSB padctl binding for Tegra210 I took a look at the above and it looks fine to me. Do you want me to put the above info into the DT binding doc? I am not sure that we need to update the binding itself. Jon -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html