Re: [kbuild-all] [PATCH] gpio: fix platform_no_drv_owner.cocci warnings

[Fengguang Wu <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 04:47:23PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 5:14 AM, kbuild test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > drivers/gpio/gpio-104-idio-16.c:151:3-8: No need to set .owner here. The core will do it.
> >
> >  Remove .owner field if calls are used which set it automatically
> >
> > Generated by: scripts/coccinelle/api/platform_no_drv_owner.cocci
> >
> > CC: William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> This is confusing, I mix up the mails coming from my pushed git branches
> with this new stuff that is obviously checking patches I haven't even applied.
> It's better if these kbuild fixes are sent as Re: to the mail ID of the
> patch so it appears in the same thread as the offending patch on the
> mailing list.

Hi Linus, the patch email does not start with "Re:", however it does contain

        In-Reply-To: <1444997709-57293-2-git-send-email-ck.hu@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

So it should show up in the same thread as this email?

        [RFC 2/2] drm/bridge: Add I2C based driver for ps8640 bridge

Thanks,
Fengguang
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html