On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 11:31 PM, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Add some information about real time compliance to the driver document. > Inspired by Grygorii Strashko's real time compliance patches. > > Cc: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@xxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > Grygorii: can you help out with some heavy comments on all I do wrong > in this document? Thx. For example I have no real clue of the difference > between generic_handle_irq() and handle_nested_irq() in this context. > > We also need to think about new helper functions that can aid driver writers > in getting drivers real time compliant and properly preemptible. Should we > have the goal to make *all* drivers using the helpers use nested/threaded IRQs, > or do you think there are (old) systems around that would suffer too much > from this? Poking Grygorii about this! Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html