On Sun, Oct 4, 2015 at 3:37 PM, Johan Hovold <johan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > This looks good (apart from the checkpatch warning for the warning > message string). Yeah the GPIO maintainer is liberal about that rule... > You also need to revert ddd5404007b8 ("gpio-sysfs: Use gpio descriptor > name instead of gpiochip names array") however as this is an ABI change. > Otherwise pins with a name in DT will now be exported using the gpio name > rather than number as they used to be. [ The current behaviour is > maintained by exporting names from chip->names for hard coded names > only. ] I think it is ABI-correct: it uses desc->name if that is set, and currently that is only set from chip->names[] so status quo. Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html