On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 1:20 PM, Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > The patches 7 and 8 are pretty independent, though they don't make much sense > without previous ones applied. To me it seems patches 5 & 6 (GPIO patches) can be applied as-is to my GPIO tree without any bad side effects. Is this correct? In that case I will apply them. Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] enable I2C devices behind I2C bus on Gen2
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] enable I2C devices behind I2C bus on Gen2
- From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2015 09:20:45 +0200
- In-reply-to: <1443698430-74415-1-git-send-email-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] enable I2C devices behind I2C bus on Gen2
- From: Andy Shevchenko
- Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] enable I2C devices behind I2C bus on Gen2
- References:
- [PATCH v2 0/8] enable I2C devices behind I2C bus on Gen2
- From: Andy Shevchenko
- [PATCH v2 0/8] enable I2C devices behind I2C bus on Gen2
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 3/3] gpio: generic: replace error variable with errptr functionality in bgpio_map
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: berlin: fix BG2CD field widths
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH v2 5/8] gpio: pca953x: store driver_data for future use
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] enable I2C devices behind I2C bus on Gen2
- Index(es):
 |