The parameter offset is an unsigned, so it makes no sense to compare it for >= 0. Fix the compiler warning regarding this by removing this comparison. As the macro GPIO_OFFSET_VALID is only used at this single place, simplify the code by dropping the macro completely and dropping the invert, too. No functional change. Signed-off-by: Dirk Behme <dirk.behme@xxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c | 4 +--- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c index bf4bd1d..9841b05 100644 --- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c @@ -47,8 +47,6 @@ */ DEFINE_SPINLOCK(gpio_lock); -#define GPIO_OFFSET_VALID(chip, offset) (offset >= 0 && offset < chip->ngpio) - static DEFINE_MUTEX(gpio_lookup_lock); static LIST_HEAD(gpio_lookup_list); LIST_HEAD(gpio_chips); @@ -914,7 +912,7 @@ const char *gpiochip_is_requested(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset) { struct gpio_desc *desc; - if (!GPIO_OFFSET_VALID(chip, offset)) + if (offset >= chip->ngpio) return NULL; desc = &chip->desc[offset]; -- 2.5.0 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html