Hi Linus, On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 2:29 PM, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 2:55 AM, Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Where possible I prefer not to apply non-DTS/DTSI patches on top of >> DTS/DTSI patches, I believe this is in keeping with how the ARM SoC >> maintainers like things handled. With this in mind I have done the following: >> >> 1. Queued up the DTSI patches (patches 1 - 3) for v4.3 in my dt branch. >> I intend for this to turn up in next soon. >> 2. Queued up for pinctrl patches (patches 4 - 6) for v4.4 in a pinctrl patch. >> I intend for these to be present in the renesas devel branch but >> not in next until after the release of v4.3-rc1. I would also be >> happy to drop them and let Linus Walleij take these patches for v4.4, >> assuming patches 1 - 3 are accepted for v4.3. > > OK. > > Will the world explode if I try to queue the pinctrl patches 4-6 in my > tree now for v4.3? Then I prefer to defer to v4.4. Else I can merge > it in parallel? There won't be a mapping between gpio and pins in any branch having the pinctrl changes but not the dtsi changes. Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html